Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mockingbirdlee

User:Mockingbirdlee

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

DearPrudence 03:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by
 * added to by IrishGuy talk 17:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Chronology of events: 1. I tag Chessckers, created by User:Mysterious J, for speedy deletion. 2. A couple of hours later, the account User:Mockingbirdlee is created. He/She immediately sets to work at vandalising both my user page and talk page. The edits are reverted, and the user is tagged as a suspected sock puppet of User:Mysterious J (not by me). 3. User:Mockingbirdlee is blocked. 4. Very soon after, the account User:Dilatedraccoon is created. The user immediately vandalises my talk page. 5. User:Dilatedraccoon vandalises my user page again (after a final warning) and makes a reference to Chessckers.
 * Evidence

Other evidence: 1. Both User:Mockingbirdlee and User:Dilatedraccoon attacked me using my userboxes - i.e., the fact that I'm for gay rights, environmentalism, etc. 2. For what it's worth, both users have animals in their usernames. It's not exactly hard evidence against them, but I thought I'd note it anyway.

I believe that Mockingbirdlee and Yummysalad (who got caught in the autoblock) are socks of Mysterious J. Mysterious J created the Chessckers article. Yummysalad is created and argues for the article to stay on the talk page. The article was marked for deletion by DearPrudence. Mockingbirdlee immediately began harassing DearPrudence which led to his/her block. Almost immediately after, Yummysalad logged in and found him/herself caught in the autoblock. IrishGuy talk 17:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * More evidence


 * Comments

Name similarity isn't enough evidence to list things here; however, if there's enough evidence to list them - name similarity is an other connection to keep in mind. Od Mishehu 06:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Just to say something, in another related case, Mysterious J vs Wikipedia, :Yummysalad is a sockpuppet of Mysterious J. I personaly think that these two cases should be combined, and only one username should be defined as the sock puppeteer. James.Denholm 09:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree - all of the accounts should be listed as sockpuppets of Mysterious J. --DearPrudence 18:15, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * See Suspected sock puppets/Mysterious J. --Akhilleus (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)