Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Obscuredata (2nd)

User:Obscuredata

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

Nomoskedasticity (talk) 16:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Obscuredata has been blocked per WP:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Drstones. Suspicion of further use of sockpuppets comes from participation on WP:Articles_for_deletion/Oxford_Round_Table_%28re-nomination%29, where we see this.
 * Evidence

This is similar to previous edits on the original AfD, see here and here. The logic of the posts is the same, as is the dodgy English (suggesting all edits made by someone with ESL).

It might also be worth considering whether there is overlap here with Suspected_sock_puppets/Billingsworth; participation on the two AfDs seems similar, see here and here.

I am not sure if this is a sock puppet or a SPA. The post immediately made me suspicious, it suggests prior knowledge of wikipedia processes but the logic is spurious and flawed and the claims are largely false, whether this is evidence of editing inexperience or just POV pushing is anyone's guess. -- neon white user page talk 18:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments

Here TwoLove admits that he was asked to comment on the AFD by a blocked user. This in itself is not a reason to block him. He has not edited since the AFD, and I don't expect that he will. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 16:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions