Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Olahus

User:Olahus

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

Buffer v2 (talk) 19:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Please see the history of the Central Europe article - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Europe&action=history See also a previous incident revealed on Marc KJH's talk page involving the Marc KJH and Olahus accounts - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Marc_KJH - see the first "Please Calm Down" discussion. See also a discussion with him using two accounts - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Central_Europe/Archive_1#Now_that_Romania_and_Croatia_have_been_added... See Marc KJH removing a sockpuppet label from Olahus' account (added by me) even though I linked it to Panel 2008 - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Olahus&action=history Also, please note that I have informed Ohalus of the case on his talk page - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Olahus&action=history like I'm supposed to and Marc KJH has deleted it http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Olahus&diff=200125866&oldid=200125660 It's funny how he's cleaning up 'another' user's talk page.
 * Evidence

There's way too many edits by the 3 accounts, some of them involved in edit warring, so won't bother using diffs (wouldn't even know how to anyway!). The whole situation is that Olahus is being biased with adding Romania to the main list in the article. He hadn't reached consensus, and any attempts to try to reach consensus with him had failed. Which is why he resorted to using his sockpuppets to impose his will on the article (it's been at a standstill for the last week because no one can edit anything without having him revert it). He reverts ALL edits he doesn't agree with (including removing Romania, or adding Romania as "sometimes Central European" or any other edit attempts which try to find a compromise). He's been involved in edit wars with the puppets as you can see from the history page. And he's been using his accounts in the discussion pages to make it seem a consensus has been reached.
 * Comments
 * This user has admitted to use sock/meatpuppets. Marc KJH (talk) 19:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Note, I've also added a checkuser request (if both aren't allowed, sorry, not really familiar with this system, and made the checkuser request first) located here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Olahus
 * This user has admitted to use sock/meatpuppets. Marc KJH (talk) 19:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

The request was made by a Sock/Meatpuppeter itself; his socks is User:Careuc
 * The CheckUser must take into account that this user uses socks: Suspected_sock_puppets/Buffer_v2 as he admitted. Marc KJH (talk) 18:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Excuse me? Make your own checkuser page.  I explained the situation there - I do have friends, my major is a double degree in politics and geography - it makes sense that they might have interest in a topic like this.  That was not posted by me and there's no way to prove your allegation.  Either way, it really has nothing to do with your actions.  This is a page for you, not me.  Like I said, you're free to make one for me.  --Buffer v2 (talk) 18:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Nobody trust your lies. You lie, you had used socks and you'll got banned for that. Now, you admit only your 'friends' helped you...come on be serious, all accounts were single-article oriented to help your own edits. You use socks, and you'll be banned for that. Despite you have double degree..fact that I take is a border lie. Marc KJH (talk) 18:43, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, even if you do get me on the Meatpuppet accusation - fine, it happened once. You did it hundreds of times. FINALLY, I dont think we're supposed to be editing here, I HAVE a talk page, and you HAVE your report page.  I'm not replying anymore on here.  Take it elsewhere.--Buffer v2 (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Buffer/Careuc and so on...you used socks not only meatpuppet but sock-puppetry Suspected sock puppets/Buffer v2. And it happened not only once. Marc KJH (talk) 18:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not even sure if discussions can take place here but let me clarify - if you check where that IP is from - it's from my SCHOOL CAMPUS - with a wireless internet connection. That is NOT my home IP, and the discussion addition from that IP was made by a friend IN my political science program.  --Buffer v2 (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Give us some proofs. What political science program? So you use laptop during work break to edit wikipedia. Marc KJH (talk) 19:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If you are using Wikipedia to push your own POV agenda.. Wikipedia is not for WP:OR original research. Marc KJH (talk) 19:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

You've got to be kidding me....?? P.S. they specifically say not to use == [text] == on the page, it messes up the format of the page. --Buffer v2 (talk) 20:05, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Checkuser returns "unrelated". GBT/C 18:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)