Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Onceloose

User:Onceloose

 * Suspected sock puppeteer


 * Suspected sock puppets
 * And a bunch more that have already been blocked
 * And a bunch more that have already been blocked
 * And a bunch more that have already been blocked

Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 14:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

After some research, I think we have another sock after comparing these two edits here and here. "came equal last" is not a common phrase and the user is pushing the same views as the other confirmed sockpuppets did. Also, use of the word "valid" and the identical claim that there is an "administrator approved" version of the page. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 14:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Evidence


 * Comments

Please see Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of GaryGazza!. My impression is that the duck has returned to the old pond. Also, one has to ask why this matter should be brought up by even the most avid Eurovisionphile... LessHeard vanU (talk) 16:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

See Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Eurovisionman and perhaps even Requests for checkuser/Case/Bruce99999. (GaryGazza is a person in common between those two cases). If anyone wants to file an WP:RFCU on Onceloose, they will need to pick a code letter and collect some evidence of abuse. I.e. diffs showing bad edits. So far the report just says that Onceloose edits a bit like some previous editors who are blocked, but it doesn't say what Onceloose has done wrong. Another approach is to show a cluster of editors who are all interested in one topic, showing the relationship of the current editor to others who were blocked before. It takes some patience to assemble that data. EdJohnston (talk) 19:04, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments by EdJohnston

After reading through the evidence again, I blocked Onceloose as a sock of GaryGazza, who checkuser found to be the same person as Eurovisionman. EdJohnston (talk) 15:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions