Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Opp2 (3rd)

User:Opp2

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer

> recently blocked > recently blocked > recently blocked > blocked long ago OCN.NE.JP ip users >looks like an open proxy. >looks like an open proxy.
 * Suspected sockpuppets

and all listed ODN and Plala IP addresses in Case 1, Case 2, Case 3 --Appletrees (talk) 12:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Requests for checkuser/Case/Kamosuke Requests for checkuser/Case/KoreanShoriSenyou Requests for checkuser/Case/Opp2 Requests for checkuser/Case/Bright888
 * Evidence

Opp2 admitted that he uses Plala, and CITIE.[] However, he also said he uses IIJ and NIFTY per his comment.. I believe Opp2 use more than these listed ISP including OCN network because behavioral patterns of various anons resemble to this new advent anons. Within a short period time, the OCN anon seems to switch IP address easily, not only a different IP address, but also previously used ones. From 2008-02-05T01:16 to 2008-02-05T05:56 (3 hours 30 minutes), his ip addresses are changed to 4 different ip addresses. I think he uses some kind of IP generator or switcher. The ips are moving back and forth. 

They all are interested in Japan-Korean related articles, but some of them show almost all of field as their favorite field, others look like a single minded account. That is just a tactic to prevent them from being caught.

Opp2 also has the same habit in writing English as "was being written". Please see the collapsed boxes in the Suspected_sock_puppets/Azukimonaka file. He is the only one using the error except Orchis29. Azukimonaka, KoreanShoriSenyou and Kamosuke did. KoreanShoriSenyou who has strong anti-Korean sentiment never appeared at Dokdo article, even at the time for vote for the article name change. Azukimonaka only appeared at that time once at the article. I assume they(?) were afraid of being discovered their true identity through Checkuser files.

"'Opp2 admitted that he uses Plala, and CITIE.'" I retract my previous comment about Opp2's current home provider that Opp2 is now most probably using plala. Sorry for not updating my knowledge.
 * Comments

"'My provider is IIJ and NIFTY. You?'" I can mention the relationship between CTIE and IIJ. I think Opp2 commented that Opp2 was using IIJ since CTIE is hosted by IIJ. Therefore, the comment was reasonable.

My another comment is about Opp2's tendency to use "is being written." Appletrees, do you have any other examples that is the same as the other suspected socks? "Is being written" (not "was being..." etc.) seems really Opp2 specific and can be useful to relate Opp2 to any other socks, while the editors whom User:Appletrees mentioned here such as Azukimonaka, KoreanShoriSenyou, and Orchis29 are using similar but not the same expression "is being written."

Anyway, I think Opp2 does not mind much to be checked again and again while Opp2 seems expressing anxiety to be designated as a sockpuppet by chance because of the popularity of the ISP.--Jjok (talk) 20:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

A related case, Requests for checkuser/Case/Celldea has been closed. The result basically showed no relation to Opp2.--Jjok (talk) 21:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Commnet: Jjok, you're the one who said that I might have been dealing with just one person (not several people, so your suggestion really encouraged me to file this) at hour talk page. You did also "teach" me how carefully I should differentiate one from various ISPs. Do you need more evidences regarding the relation between the above mentioned users and Opp2? Fine, I only included partial of what I have because I wanted to make this file compact. You also missed to point out on @nifty, one of which Opp2 asserted to use. I have some that ip addresses which seems related to dog meat. The RFCU file you added to here is no relation with his case. That is all about Watermint and meatpuppetry of yours. I found something weird on the result.--Appletrees (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Another related CU request has been filed at Requests for checkuser/Case/2008FromKawasaki. It looks like K-J content disputes and User:Appletrees wants to know how many pro-Japanese and Japanese ultraright editors are acting, and ban them all because they disgrace Korean images with reliable sources.--Jjok (talk) 20:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Jjok, well, regardless of my several efforts to inform you about chinilpa, you are insisting on calling yourself as such, from now I may regard you as a Korean senior born before 1930s. As for the the images, you're the one who takes the responsibility for the edit warring. You may also want to see this Talk:Sea of Japan. This explains why I have been chased by so many disruptive editors and why suddenly participants are increased for the poll at Sea of Japan article and began to change rankings related to Korea. What a wonderful party with meatpuppetry but isn't it nothing new. --Appletrees (talk) 15:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I believe the accusations are overly broad and the evidence is not well-organized. For the future, concentrate on a smaller number of accounts where you can demonstrate a conclusive linkage with a concise presentation of evidence. Jehochman Talk 21:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions