Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Other2

User:Other2

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

 freshacconci  speak to me  22:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Edits to the same article on the same day, with almost identical information. The edits concern Steve Kurtz and violate WP:BIO. Other2 has received warnings. The editing shifted to Enin5.
 * Evidence

One edits arrest record and one external links, hardly the same. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 22:30, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * I'm referring to Other2's edit here and Enin5's edit here. More than a bit of a coincidence on the same day, after one was warned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freshacconci (talk • contribs) 22:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * A comment was left on my talk page here, by an anonymous IP referring to the relevant edits.  freshacconci  speak to me  23:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

I tried to add a link to the links page. It was deleted. I thought it was an error. I tried again, and was presented with the summary, saying I had to add my content there. I did. It was deleted. I thought this was an error, I tried again, it was deleted. I contacted the WP contact email, and was told I needed to provide references for the information. I obtained the court case number, for the federal case, which was the source for the information I was providing. I tried to login as Other2, I could not. I thought this was an error. So I created a new account. This time, I referenced the source of the information, from the federal court case, but I was not presented with access to enter it in the summary section, only the arrest section appeared as editable. So I entered it there. It was deleted twice.
 * Response

This is an instance where 2 supporters of Steve Kurtz are creating a biased report on him, and not allowing for other facts which do not support their view to be entered.

Also--why does Freshacconci, and artist, and instructor at 2 universities, and the author of this entry, gets to issue warnings AND block facts from being entered into this record? What a perfect scenerio for perpetuating propaganda; much more biased than the traditional media. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Other2 (talk • contribs) 00:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Inconclusive. Edits look more like users interested in same topic. What is interesting is that they were both recently created. Without more editing evidence or a CU, there is not enough here to block. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 21:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions