Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Owenisgood

User:Owenisgood

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

— Travis talk  23:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Same article, Bartholomewism, created by both usernames. Article was deleted once before and has now been recreated and prod'd. Article refers to an Owen Bartholomew, which leads one to believe that User:Owenisgood and User:Owenb1991 are one in the same.
 * Evidence

I don't have access to deleted edits. Assuming that Travis is correct, there's no mitigating evidence because the users have made no other productive edits, and the usernames are similar. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 15:18, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * I can confirm that the article was indeed created by User:Owenisgood on 21:22, 17 March 2006 and recreated by User:Owenb1991 on 22:14, 12 December 2007.  Snowolf How can I help? 21:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Also User:Owenisgood did uploaded an image called [[Image:Bartholomewism.jpg]] which contained the same text of the article Bartholomewism, however the text of the article that User:Owenb1991 created was different (same concept) but since there are only 7 results on Google for the term, 3 of which from Wikipedia (well, one from Answers.com displaying text from wikipedia) I very much doubt that somebody else then a same Owen Bartholomew would have create an article on it.  Snowolf How can I help? 21:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I've took some time and read http://ickyface.deviantart.com's entry for Tuesday, October 09, 2007 which is one of the results (the only one that gives a clue). It's a conversation between two persons identified as gotnocash16 and sushi4thedentist, that further in the conversation refer to theirselves as Adam (gotnocash16) and Tessa (sushi4thedentist). The only references to other person (not necessary involved with the issues) as been to a Blanco (referred in the following line sushi4thedentist (9:39:31 PM): and Blanco’s so stupid), Anna (referred in the following line gotnocash16 (4:32:13 PM): aw that sucks.. how r u gona mail stuff to anna and others), katie' (totally unrelated, appears to be a girl who goes at the same school as the other two). No mention of an "Owen" whatsoever. It seems that this two friends has decided to create a religion, started more as a joke than something serious but then seriously thought that I had some good point. Some random quotes from the lengthy conversation:


 * gotnocash16 (9:09:41 PM): this should be another chapter is the bartholomewist scripture
 * gotnocash16 (9:11:23 PM): this may yet become a rather nice religon
 * gotnocash16 (10:05:57 PM): our religion should perhaps die with us
 * gotnocash16 (4:35:25 PM): we wont have superior teachers in our religon
 * gotnocash16 (4:35:53 PM): everyone will be an equal.. the only thing that will be differnt will be the level of understanding
 * No mention of an Owen then, but I doubt that it's not the same person. Leaving open for giving the chance to the editor to reply.  Snowolf How can I help? 21:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

I hadn't thought to read through that link, but it seems to confirm my original suspicion that “Bartholomewism” is something made up in school one day. Thanks for digging, Snowolf. — Travis talk  22:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Blocked both indef for socking and hoaxiing. Pretty conclusive, don't see anything constructive here. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 01:06, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions