Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/PPG345

User:PPG345

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by


 * Evidence

See Suspected sock puppets/PPG2007. It's an archived case, but I am not sure how to re-open it with (yet another) sock. Yng varr  18:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Besides name similarity, what else for evidence do you have? — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 23:14, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments


 * Pretty much the same behaviour that's listed in the archived sock case; the socks are focused on adding previously disputed material to List of characters in Camp Lazlo. Here's some diffs for comparison:


 * 1) PPG345's only edit to the article in question:
 * 2) One of PPG2008's edits, same article:
 * 3) A couple of PPG2007's edits for the same article:

Pretty much the same article with the same material. The user has edited other articles, but those aren't on my watchlist nor do I edit, so I can only compare to the article given here. Yng varr  01:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm going to make an educated guess that PPG345 is a sock as suspected, but I don't have enough evidence to be certain. Also, I reviewed the earlier case, so it might be good if an uninitiated eye can be brought to bear on this case.  I'm not comfortable recommending an indef-block without a checkuser, but the old account may be too old to checkuser.  Maybe the best thing to do is to keep this under advisement: if PPG345 really is a sockpuppet, and is here to troll Camp Lazlo articles, we can expect to see more edits along those lines. (Or he'll realize that he's under suspicion, so he'll quit using this account and start using yet another account.) Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm a bit late on the reply here, but /shrug. Since no further edits were made, I'd suspect they'll just disappear (only to pop up later, when "the coast is clear"). Well, I'll leave it up to the admins on what they want to do with this case: close and archive it, or leave it open just in case. Yng  varr  14:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm convinced enough, indef block. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 03:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions