Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (4th)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Pflanzgarten

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer

'''indef blocked '''indef blocked '''indef blocked Previous socks in Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Pflanzgarten
 * Suspected sockpuppets

Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 05:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Report submission by:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jim_Clark&diff=83992485&oldid=83809559
 * Evidence
 * Admitted block evasion in this edit summary:
 * Same pattern of reverts and misleading edit summaries as previous socks and puppetteer
 * Single purpose account to edit Jim Clark
 * Currently active - last edit 03.40 Oct 28
 * Now 13:50 Oct 28 (same old revert), same again at 17:08 Oct 28

Latest: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jim_Clark&diff=prev&oldid=84416696

Two more Pflanzgarten socks have appeared today Bestever and Lotus_48, sole use accounts again editing Jim Clark. Misleading edit summaries on both mentioning "vandalism" Maybe a full page protect might be more useful to let this cool off? M100 10:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Lotus_48 is still active as a single use block evasion account; last edit 19:43, 31 October. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 19:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Comments

Carrera 6 blocked by William M. Connolley under WP:3RR - 411 LE springs fully formed from the woodwork with the same old revert and the same comments. -- Ian Dalziel 13:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Already blocked. Kil  o • T 12:11, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Conclusions