Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Philscirel

User:philscirel

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

Adoniscik(t, c) 05:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Aforementioned user is currently blocked and may be editing by logging out to evade the ban. (The edit pattern was a tip-off.) Please check identity.
 * Evidence

quack Toddst1 (talk) 21:18, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments


 * My educated opinion, after having observed this user's behavior over the summer is that should simply stay away from all articles related to Fethullah Gülen‎, due to incorrigible partisanship. . (S)he jealously guards the article (the only one he contributes to) and lacks respect for core WP issues such as seeking consensus, RS, COI, and NPOV. He just might become fit to contribute to it once he racks up some edits on other articles to soak up the culture. --Adoniscik(t, c) 23:27, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

i am a new user, trying to contribute wikipedia about a topic i feel like i know a lot. i am also trying to learn the system here and protect myself from the attacks of two senior editors. two well experienced users (User:Adoniscik, User:Nandesuka) performing newbies are trying to push me to the edge. they have buddies to polish their user pages, , while they template new users to create a negative image for whom they don't feel so friendly about., , .

my computer connects through two wireless ip available, automatically: one with regular ip, and the other is 24.172.221.206. after i am blocked by a moderator (i am still not sure why only me got the ticket while others just warned, ), i posted a note on my talk page. after i connected to the internet, i realized that i am able to edit. i thought my block is removed. once i have made a change,, i realized that a sockpuppetry case is immediately posted against me by User:Adoniscik. i would like to state clearly that 24.172.221.206 is also my ip address.

based on an earlier talk and suspicious edits of User:Adoniscik, i posted a request for ip check (suspected sockpuppets {{{user5|Aalpay}},, , ), but my request is deleted from the queue., , . i will repeated the request for the same user. please have a look at the information there too. i briefly listed the evidence i have against him/her below:
 * user refer to another article stating that (please see Ergenekon's article, all suspects are listed despite there is no court ruling agaist them yet. If the court rules in favour of suspects, they would be still listed in the wiki page, we just can not pretent it never happened) (AA 11:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)). the only common editor on Fethullah Gulen and Ergenekon articles was User:Adoniscik.
 * user post a peer review request and also mention about asking a bunch of people to take an outsider's look.
 * user claims consensus in disputes and involve in edit wars using more than one username and claim that the other users are independent from him.
 * User:Adoniscik using NPOV policy as a pretext to degrade gulen and his movement. s/he does not discuss his/her edits. he is posting inappropriate templates to give a negative impression on the whole article written by many. although i consistently ask them to locate and specify the problems -instead of posting templates on the whole article- for a fix, he does not do it.

i am also surprised that i am blocked from editing by a moderator although i made all my edits based on the discussion on the talk page of Fethullah Gulen. other two users (User:Adoniscik, User:Nandesuka) who use the edit summaries in the place of discussion page were not. isn't what they are doing an edit war? i like the admins please have a careful look at the case. all my and other editors' edits are in the history pages of Fethullah Gulen.

thanks...

Philscirel


 * When you are blocked you should sit out your punishment. If you edit from an anonymous account you are evading your block and you are sockpuppetting that anon account.
 * When you are blocked (whether you agree or not) there are only a few options
 * Accept and undergo your punishment and start anew afterwards
 * Appeal and accept the decision of the appeal
 * Evade block by creating a new account, or editing from an anonymous IP number. This latter is clear disrespect for Wikipedia guidelines and basically cheating. This latter behaviour may (and in my opinion should) result in very much extended blocks, or even total ban from the project.
 * It appears that you have chosen the last option, which maybe through your inexperience. I would strongly advise against that option though; and the risk of being blocked for long durations is all yours. Arnoutf (talk) 20:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


 * See history of User:Philscirel and history of User:24.172.221.206] as well as this edit to ANI. Toddst1 (talk) 21:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * Both IPs confirmed by sockpuppeteer and blocked for block evasion.  blocked indefinitely for repeated block evasion Toddst1 (talk) 21:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)