Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Polygamy4

User:Polygamy4

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

Dtm142 21:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Evidence

All of them have identical styles of writing, interpreting Wikipedia policies, and contributions such as to Family First Party, Talk:Transsexualism, and some Australian Christianity articles. The IPs are both blocked due to edit warring and abusive sockpuppetry. Polygamy4, x4, and istx4 linger on inappropriate username as well.

Yawn. (It's 10:30 PM where I live right now.) It's painfully obvious that these are all the same user, based on the similar usernames and editing patterns. All accounts should be blocked indefinitely. The self-identification of this person as a polygamist is a borderline violation of username policy, and if this person ever returns, he should create a name that does not involve polygamy. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 02:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments

Whats wrong with that, you dont have a problem going around telling everyone your are a jew? Its old accounts that stopped working because of passwords screwing up. I just have one account this one and only use one at a time. If you persectute me, ill just have to change ips (takes about 5 minutes) then odviously create a new id completely different(Hiding myself) instead of being open (which is not a sock puppet) then I wont be able to go to certain pages so will have to work on ones I really dont care about and just give up on contributing worth while editing this blog site just for fun and justice--Polygamistx4 03:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Your IP sockpuppets are both blocked (block evasion, which is against the rules). It would still be ban evasion.  And Wikipedia is not a blog. Dtm142 03:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes but if you delete an account which im contriubiting with because of you funfair and biased against me, what can i do. Your choice.--Polygamistx4 04:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC) First let me say that there's nothing here (other than perhaps evading 3RR) that constitutes forbidden sockpuppetry. That said, I am blocking Polygamistx4 as almost all of his contributions are to talk pages, and he admittedly is treating Wikipedia as a discussion/debate site instead of an encyclopedia. There are legions of other sites that do serve that purpose. Wikipedia does not. As to the other accounts with forgotten passwords, I won't block those unless they begin editing again. Just drop a note by my talk page, please.--Chaser - T 08:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions