Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Premier 2nd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Premier

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

See also Suspected sock puppets/Premier
 * Note

&rArr; bsnowball  18:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Report submission by:

this edit seems clear case of using annon to create illusion of support for contentious material. the other 2 edits (at the moment) seem similar enough, to users previous to establish this. as noted in 1st report on this user, i am involved in this debate.
 * Evidence


 * Comments

Premier here. What "contentious material" would this be?

Surely we're not talking about the work of the great anthropologist Walter Roth are we? Surely not?

Tell me it ain't so Joe.

Premier 01:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

from Talk:Indigenous Australians

Discussion of cannibalism has been reduced to a single line, but it's still ok. Any mention of the issue at all is a victory.

Opponents of Australian Aboriginies are quite pleased.

124.184.172.177 13:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)


 * It does seem odd that *all* these new users from the same IP range could be so interested in one talk page on one article, to the exclusion of all others. Orderinchaos78 (t 00:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

07:08, December 29, 2006 Hesperian (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Premier (contribs)" with an expiry time of indefinite: so closing this SSP. AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions