Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Protagon

User:Protagon
Unknown
 * Suspected sockpuppeteer
 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

No Free Nickname Left (talk) 18:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

His talk page, where he admitts he is a sock puppet
 * Evidence


 * Comments


 * This user entered the Russians page and started edit warring. A concensus was reached there long ago but he keeps on reverting the page.


 * I decided to enter to his page to see who this user is, and i have seen that he openly declares himself to be a sock pupet.


 * The edits he is doing is execly the vandalizm we once complained on. The complain can be found here. Please check him out if he's one of those vandals.


 * And something out of the case, if possible, make the Russians page protected in a way that only registered users could edit it, since as you can see, most of the time the vandals are not registered.


 * As you could see by my contributions page, i havent been here lately because i have studies and dont have time to be here, and unfortinetley after this messege i probably wont be here again for a few weeks, so i hope i was helpful.


 * The fact that the user ain't doing those edits from his account, but opens a sock pupet, and admite to it, already shows theres a reason people dont listen to him on his real account. I have a few guesses who this user is, but there's no use in saying because you sinply can find out. Sock Pupets are very dangerous for Wikipedia.


 * Apparently, the user is using sockpuppets for legit reasons. As long as he isn't using his original account to help his side win, it's not considered "abusive." --EoL talk 01:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * And diffs. We need some diffs to compare. --EoL talk 01:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

PLUS who is supposed to be the sockpuppet(s)? — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 01:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Not an abusive case and not enough information. --EoL talk 21:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions