Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pyaremohan

User:Pyaremohan

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

Mugunth 12:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

This user is warning me of vandalism, when I've not vandalized... Moreover, this users' total edit count is just 4, of which 3 edits were, inserting vandal warning templates to user pages. I've not seen newbies using vandal warnings templates so early! I suspect some sockpuppeter stuff of some formerly blocked editors. Can you admins please check ?
 * Evidence

Another evidence: User:Dosarassam was blocked previously owing to vandalism... Here on his talk page, in his unblock request, he was accusing me of vandalism... though I was only removing his *junk* 50 external links... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dosarassam&diff=prev&oldid=170504509 This user could be a sockpuppet of User:Dosarassam, but I'm not very sure.. I don't know how to ensure this... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mugunth Kumar (talk • contribs) 13:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Interesting how here complains about the reporting user not obtaining any consensus, and then with their second and third edits (here for example), they warn the reporting user about not obtaining any consensus on the article they are disputing - North India. Bmg 916 Speak 14:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * If not a sockpuppet, contribs are seemingly at least disruptive and done in bad faith. Pyaremohan does seem to have an agenda right off the bat against the user who made this report, and it does seem to be similar disruption of the suspected puppeteer on the article in question.  Bmg 916 Speak 15:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Blocked as sockpuppet. WP:DUCK. Case therefore closed. RyanGerbil10 (Говорить!) 00:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions