Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/SEGA (2nd)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:SEGA

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

edgarde 00:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Three new accounts created to edit-war in Black Sabbath albums and fight for preservation of copyvio images.
 * Evidence


 * JudasAngel – account created 2007-05-23T22:35:53

Single-issue sock on a campaign for which SEGA has employed other single issue socks in the past (notably Rumitoid and OneLove1977), demoting non-"official" members (always Geoff Nicholls) of Black Sabbath in album credits (contrary to WP:ALBUM and contrary to consensus).

Diffs are basicly edit history for this account:           

/ edgarde 00:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Changes pattern here by editing single Black Sabbath album article using different names. Note abusive and misleading edit summaries, a SEGA behavior.


 * GlennGoins &mdash; account created 2007-05-24T23:36:44
 * Note misleading Edit summary here
 * Note "You know I'm right" language (comparable to OneLove1977 and some of SEGA's language), here


 * GregPhilMan &mdash; account created 2007-05-24T23:51:13
 * Note abusive Edit summary here
 * Note fondness for copyvio material (and abusive summary) here
 * A likely WP:DISRUPT: legit images deleted

/ edgarde 04:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Compare with contribs by

SEGA is subject to a community ban for having made over 40 sockpuppets, and uploading massive amounts of WP:COPYVIO images. Is an IP block possible for this user? The puppets are breeding like bunnies.
 * Comments

Page still exists for Suspected_sock_puppets/SEGA. This report is Suspected sock puppets/SEGA (2nd).


 * Conclusions
 * All of these accounts are blocked. --Akhilleus (talk) 22:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)