Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Samwisep86

User:Samwisep86

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

Samwisep86 19:38, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Per the talk page of Phi Kappa Psi User:SlamDiego believes me to have User:Rjproie as a sock puppet.
 * Evidence

In defense of myself, I have just been supporting RJ in his discussion on Phi Psi. I do not know him personally or in Real Life. The contributions he and I have made are coincidental, odd as they may appear. I have worked since last year contributing to the the Fraternity and Sorority WikiProject and watching the vandalism on those pages, which occur a lot. I have a stellar record and there has been no evidence in the past of myself doing malicious harm to any article. Let assume good faith be your guide in this incidence. Also, If I was operating a sock puppet, would I be reporting myself? Thank you, Samwisep86 19:38, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments


 * I was asked for help in this issue by User:Rjproie and have added my comments at User_talk:SlamDiego. I do not believe there is enough evidence of sockpuppetry here. Cheers. Dina 23:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The foundation of the charge was that Samwisep86 admitted to having done something demonstrably not done qua User:Samwisep86, but instead done qua User:Rjproie. As I have stipulated to the admin to whom I first directed User:Samwisep86's implicit admission, said admission and other false or inconsistent declarations from User:Samwisep86 and from User:Rjproie could be the products of gross confusion and later panic, rather than of sockpuppetry and intent to deceive. —SlamDiego 01:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

I know Samwise in Real Life, and believe sockpuppetry to be completely out of character. I also think that the apparent confusion in who requested what is an easy mistake to make (especially on the part of SW and RJ, since I've been there too).&mdash;ScouterSig 03:13, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions