Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Sarner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Sarner

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

Nwwaew( My talk page ) 14:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Report submission by:


 * Evidence
 * 
 * 

Both of their edit histories have edit summaries in capitals. Furthermore, both of these users have edits in common on Advocates for Children in Therapy and the talk page of Candace Newmaker. Nwwaew( My talk page ) 14:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Comments

None of my edit summaries are in all caps. Those were just my replies under someone else's headings. And, Sarner and I have disagreed on some issues. StokerAce 00:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Blocked. I was worried about blocking this account, but the evidence, after being looked into further, appears to indicate that it is so. Kil  o • T 21:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Conclusions


 * I'm very confused. I'm not a sockpuppet of Sarner and have in fact disagreed with him on certain issues.  And I don't seem to be blocked.  Can someone explain to me what is going on? Thanks. StokerAce 23:43, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oops! I mean "not blocked". Please take this to WP:RFCU. Kil  o • T  12:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)