Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Scubster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Scubster

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

 Eliminator JR  Talk  19:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by:


 * Evidence

See this AfD for Blessed by a broken heart


 * Both User:Scubster (the creator of the page!) and new account User:Somethinghadtodie have posted on it, and both notably share the spelling error of "notable" as "nottible"


 * Now, Scubster regularly does this spelling error - see this AfD where he shouts a bit. Oddly (or not), there is also a reference to this second AfD on Somethinghadtodie's talk page....


 * They also write in the same manner - compare User:Somethinghadtodie's contribution to the first AfD, with User:Scubster's comment that starts "Once again..." on the 2nd one.


 * Also see the history of User:Scubster's user page as to his/her attitude to his/her pages being deleted.


 * Comments


 * I'm just going to say that's not very good evidence to accuse someone of something like that. "Like OMG two people misspelled a word. OMG! they're the same person!" if you take that attitude then everyone who spells a word right is the same person.Scubster 05:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That may or may not be enough evidence on it's own, but in addition to that, other evidence has been presented. The fact that you misspelled a word is not what is the main point here, but the fact that another user misspelled the same word, in addition to having a similar writing style. I'd say this is sufficient evidence to make a case, if not to warrant a checkuser. GofG undefinedundefinedundefined  Contribs 22:24, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * How do we have similar writing styles?? That doesn't prove anything, even if two people have similar writing style that doesn't mean they're the same person. That doesn't justify anything it just proves you guys have way too much time on your hands. If you're looking soo hard into two people's writing styles to say they're a sockpuppet then you're pretty much a fucking loser. I do not appriciate being called a liar or a puppet master, BUT you guys can go to hell because GUESS WHAT you may have power on a fucking website like Wikipedia but you're still a fucking no life loser who sits at home on your god damn computer with nothing better to do than look up gay porn and masturbate. go to hell this will be my last response to this dumb ass thing.Scubster 03:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

it's been more than ten days and nothing has happened with this. so i took it off my page.Somethinghadtodie 03:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Suspicious but inconclusive, possible case for checkuser. Seraphimblade Talk to me 13:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)