Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Shravak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Shravak
first edit is to insert exactly the same text into Dattatreya as previously inserted by less than 1 hour after Shravak had reverted the article 4 times despite having been warned of 3RR. A copy of the details from the 3RR report follows:
 * Evidence


 * Previous version reverted to: Revision as of 17:28, 29 August 2006


 * 1st revert: 21:54, 30 August 2006
 * 2nd revert: 22:01, 30 August 2006
 * 3rd revert: 22:12, 30 August 2006
 * 4th revert: 22:20, 30 August 2006
 * 5th revert: 22:55, 30 August 2006 (probable sock, User:Dattat's first edit)

Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :
 * 22:11, 30 August 2006

Time report made: 22:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Admins, please do not delete this evidence page. Then the subject cannot find out why I accused them and they start asking and become hostile. The evidence should stand regardless of whether it is closed without action. -999 (Talk) 19:16, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Admins, 999 had been bulling me and trying to intimidate me by calling me a sockpuppett because of one edit. Does Wikipedia really allow such tactics? I can't seem to get any answers from anyone. I don't know where to go for help. Dattat 20:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Account has been blocked. Iola k ana • T  13:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC)