Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Skoppensboer

User:Skoppensboer

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

David Ruben Talk 03:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Silverye seems single purpose account on just Talk:Prostatitis whose sole purpose seems to be to personally attack User:Reasonablelogicalman. As such nature of attack seems very similar to Skoppensboer's breaches of NPA and AGF.
 * Evidence

Hence Silverye: these 1st Nov ( and this thanking Skoppensboer) and now 3 Nov

Compared to Skoppensboer: Nov1 "Listen up, you self-promoting vandal and liar..." upon which I served a uw-npa4im warning, Nov2 with suggestion off-wiki legal liability, Nov2 "Reasonablelogicalman seems to have a severe reading comprehension problem, or perhaps some other intellectual problem that is preventing him from understanding basic human communication.", Nov3,  attack and deniel of sockpuppetry Nov4

Both editors have accused each other of being owner of external links removed from the article. Skoppensboer had suggested Reasonablelogicalman as using sockpuppet of an anon IP account, which I placed into Requests for checkuser/Case/Reasonablelogicalman (request deemed "Unnecessary. This seems like a clear case to me. The IP is clearly the same user as the account in question, on behaviour alone"). The acromonious bickering clearly needs to stop, and as I have offered to look into the medical literature and offer my assessment of the NPOV (the only thing they have both agreed on), I should probably try to excuse myself from admin action on the article/editors. So I would be grateful for outside opinions and action where deemed necessary. David Ruben Talk 03:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * This is the comparision: http://tools.wikimedia.org/~eagle/socks/Skoppensboer.html. Take what you want from it. ——  Eagle 101 Need help? 05:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)]

Hmmm ... at the very least, they're clearly meatpuppets. That's enough by itself to block Silverye. Blueboy96 13:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Silvereye blocked as a SPA and likely sock of Skoppensboer, who is given a strong warning. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 22:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions


 * I reversed myself based on evidence Silvereye sent me. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 11:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)