Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Sm1969


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Sm1969

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

Smeelgova 20:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC).
 * Report submission by:

It appears that User:Sm1969 is using an IP as a sockpuppet to revert the disputed edit. John254 19:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Evidence
 * From Block decided on User Sm1969
 * Per Users John254 and William M. Connolley :
 * This now places User:Sm1969 in clear violation of the 3RR, on the basis of    John254 19:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

No even close to "in 24h" in the original. But with the sock, OK, 8h first offence William M. Connolley 20:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC) Yours, Smeelgova 20:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC).
 * Note on 2nd sockpuppet: This IP address was warned in the past by two separate editors to stop blanking article pages. , .  Yours, Smeelgova 20:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC).
 * These must be IP addresses from my company which has over 1,000 employees. I have no idea what they are referring to. Sm1969 — Possible single purpose account: Sm1969 (talk • contribs)  has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * One of the IP address reversion notes is about an article on desi and I have no idea what they are talking about. If I forget to long while at a company, it picks up (I assume) an IP address shared with over 1,000 people.  I assume one of them reverted something on desi six months ago from what it is referring to. Sm1969 05:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

05:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Sm1969 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Comments
 * I (Sm1969) have three computers and sometimes forget to log in. This is not intentional.  As an aside, another administrator appears to have reverted the edit back to what I did, removing Smeelgova's edit which found me guilty of violating 3RR.  I appear to have been vindicated.  I will be more rigorous about logging in. Sm1969 20:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Sm1969 (talk • contribs)  has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * See above comments from Users John254 and William M. Connolley, on how User Sm1969 utilized his IP address/sockpuppet to continue making more reversions, multiple times after being warned not to do so. Smeelgova 20:34, 17 October 2006 (UTC).

Is this not being delt with on the 3RR notice board? Kil  o • T 12:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I was cited once for 3RR and that was all. I will be paranoid about making sure I log in. The 3RR claim was to revert a link to copyrighted material without permission.  The citing user and person I violated 3RR with had been putting in links to a video and changing the links to the updated video, even including at piratebay.org.  My edits were completely in good faith.  I have never blanked any articles.  Sm1969 05:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Sm1969 (talk • contribs)  has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.


 * Conclusions
 * Not blocking. IPs appear unrelated to the account. If you need further assitance, put a note on my talk page, or go to WP:RFCU. Kil  o • T  13:24, 20 October 2006 (UTC)