Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Soccermeko(8th)

User:Soccermeko

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

Kww (talk) 17:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Same obsession with Nicole Wray. Anonymous IP's have been editing the talk pages of User:Staticj, a convicted sock, proclaiming his innocence, and User:KingLilTroy, "warning" him that other people might accuse him of being a sockpuppet. Now, 4.129.65.144 has nominated Nicole Wray for deletion, complaining that the editors that revert his sockpuppetry are conspiring to prevent Nicole Wray from having a good article, so there shouldn't be one at all.
 * Evidence
 * This is not evidence but bad faith. There is nothing against helping another user. When he knows I am right, he tries to cover the situation up with something else, in this case, sockpuppetry of Soccermeko. 4.129.65.144 (talk) 17:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

You need to stop with your accessions of User:Soccermeko. The only time I edited Nicole Wray's page was to add the Article for deletion template. You need serious help with your deranged problems. Everyone who has edited Nicole Wray's pages is not a sockpuppet. Can't you get that through your stupid head. If you can't get that, then someone needs to take a hammer and beat some sense in your head. And does this turn from Nicole Wray to Soccermeko. 4.129.65.144 (talk)
 * Comments

User:Kww is trying to lead us from the truth that he has a sockpuppet account most likely User:Jayron32. He trying to use another user's past to stop others. 4.129.65.144 (talk) 17:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

✅ I don't think we can make any assumptions about the named account at this point, based on two edits; however, Gwen Gale has blocked the commenting IP here as an obvious sock of Soccermeko, and I think there will be more attention placed on these articles to keep an eye out for further disruption. Not much more we can do with the IPs. We can call this one sorted out, I think. Tony Fox (arf!) 16:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC)