Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Thanos5150

User:Thanos5150

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

NJGW (talk) 23:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Both POV SPA wp:fringe pushing accounts, currently edit warring at the same two articles they love to edit, and together are past 3rr (5 revisions in 18 hours). Warned about Sock policy on September 15.
 * Evidence

Note: 24.20.80.41 signs his edits as Thanos5150, in the exact same manner as Thanos5150, on talk pages that Thanos5150 has subsequently edited:   --Ronz (talk) 02:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Note: He's edited as :

--Ronz (talk) 02:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

I was looking mostly at his main article edits... guess it's just a 3rr/SPA issue then. NJGW (talk) 03:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Actually, that's still disruptive use of multiple accounts in the same article, and those who don't check the talk page history closely would get confused. NJGW (talk) 03:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

DEFENSE: I have not used any accounts deceptively and quite frankly have no idea what you are talking about. At times I may forget to sign in but always put thanos5150 after my comments. If I have made an edit without signing in it is not a conscious thought on my part. I might open and close my browser several times in a day or have several browsers open at once and look back to the page and make edits without thinking to sign back in or even knowing I was signed out.thanos5150
 * I agree that he hasn't used ip accounts deceptively. --Ronz (talk) 01:55, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Ronz. I have been an erstwhile contributor here for a long time and have nothing to hide.

I would also say that I have also been accused of "disruptive" edits when in reality the exact opposite is true. I was only restoring the disruptive edits user Doug Weller who continually removed a whole paragraph that had been in the articel for several months because I removed one POV word he used to willfully discredit an author and idea. The article should have been left restored until the matter was resolved in the discussion page, not removed. That's like being guilty until proven innocent.thanos5150 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thanos5150 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

No action. Submitter agrees no deception and AGF on the forgot to log in issue. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 11:40, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions