Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Totemruby

User:Totemruby

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

Yngvarr (t) (c) 20:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Report submission by


 * Evidence
 * 1) Totemruby edits Cartoon Network (United States) adding material which is disputed: [. Please notice the tag if you can think of anymore feel free to add.
 * 2) Treelo reverts these edits
 * 3) Totemruby reverts this revert
 * 4) PeruAlonso removes this material
 * 5) Totemruby re-adds the disputed material . Again, the tagline if you can think of anymore feel free to add.
 * 6) A notice is placed on Totemruby talk page to ask them to stop
 * 7) Someone else must have reported Totemruby to AIV, as they are given a short block /
 * 8) When the block wears off, Totemruby responds on my talk page
 * 9) My response . I won't detail the conversation, but we have a continued dialog which is visible on my talk page

At this time Special:Contributions/163.150.227.74 adds the same disputed material, with the tell-tale tagline if you can think of anymore feel free to add. Please notice that the only contribution this IP makes is to the article in question, with the disputed material.

I inform Totemruby, on my talk page, to cease with their disruptions and engage in discussion, but Totemruby denies adding the material as an anon IP

Now, Special:Contributions/Sethdloo appears, adding the same disputed material with the same tell-tale tagline if you can think of anymore feel free to add.

There has been continued effort on my part to ask the user to cease their additions. The additions are unsightly, disrupt the flow of prose, and are not in alignment with both the project wide manual of style, as well as the Cartoon Network WikiProject manual of style (which closely follows the en.wiki MOS).

Rather than agree to discussion, the user simply adds the material once as a logged-off anonymous IP, and then again as newly registered user Sethdloo.

this is the truth. Everything i say is the truth wether it is believd or not. I did revert the revert. I was upset that my list was removed. i am sorry for that now and apoligize. Then i am accused for socking. sethdool is not my sock puppet. The truth is that he is actually my friend who goes to school with me. After he saw me edit it several times, he made an account and put it back to please me. At this time i did not know it was wrong. But i will tell him promptly that it is and explain to him why.Totemruby (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 22:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC). about the tagline thing. I think sethdool just reverted it back to my first edit. when he did that wouldnt it have the same thing i first wrote?. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Totemruby (talk • contribs) 22:35, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * confession
 * tagline

Sethdloo blocked indef, Totemruby blocked, if Totemruby resumes disruption then report to ANI and he should be blocked for longer. Guy (Help!) 21:51, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Closed. Black Kite 15:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC)