Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Vinay412 (2nd)

User:Vinay412

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

(added 2 August 2007)


 * Report submission by

andy 11:51, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

User is attempting to undo revisions to two articles that were favourites of banned sockpuppeteer Vinay412
 * Evidence

The restored revisions are sections that were heavily edited by sockpuppets of Vinay412

User's only other edit is this - there is a link to this talk page from my contributions page and my archived talk but no other obvious link that Never bdsd might have followed

Miyamw - evidence

User has recreated Human_figure which was deleted and redirected after an AfD debate which included a lot of sockpuppetry.

The user is a single-purpose account

The recreated article contains a reference to Female body shape which was jealously guarded by Vinay412, as was the original version of this article.

The style of English is very similar to that of Vinay412's previous edits.

The previous discussion on the article has been archived, without any link to the archive

andy 09:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * user:Vinay412 is blocked as sockpuppet of User:Kuntan. So moving it to kuntan, and adding that latest sockpuppet of kuntan is vinay412. if you undo this move i will take it to arbcom.
 * admins dont twist the rules at your will, i will have to take it to arbcom, and i will post a case by creating a sockpupet, with opposite parties as admins User:Ryulong, User:Sandstein, User:Kinu, User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington for misuse of admin privileges and negligence. Never bdsd 07:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Socksuspect has not answered the allegation but instead disruptively moved the page (with threats). I've reverted the move. andy 19:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It is not threat, but it is "notice" served. Please do not mistake.Never bdsd 07:11, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

You say striked? I disown you, boor. What's your business in IIsc? Milching the buffaloes? 16:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Looks like a match. All the listed accounts are indef blocked. --Akhilleus (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions