Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/WALTHAM1

User:WALTHAM1

 * Suspected sock puppeteer


 * Suspected sock puppets


 * Report submission by
 * Den dodge  Talk Contribs 23:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Evidence
 * All users have made edits to the article, such as:
 * WALTHAM1:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 * Enigmamann:
 * WALTHAM2:
 * The similarity in the account names of WALTHAM1 and WALTHAM2 is obvious
 * Having had some of his edits to the above article reverted or altered by User:Enigmaman, the user created the Enigmamann account specifically to impersonate the user (including using the same userpage design) and made an edit to that article

Concur with Dendodge. Enigmamann is blocked, and Waltham1 stopped editing two days prior to Waltham2's appearance. Waltham2 is now the active account. I can block Waltham1 and let Waltham2 be the prime. I'll check with Waltham2 on their talk page to determine their preferred primary account. I also will leave open the option of blocking all three accounts, but want to look into things a bit more. Hiberniantears (talk) 17:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Abusive sockpuppetry. I would recommend indef blocking one of the two accounts and blocking the other one for 24 hours with a warning that further socking will result in an indefinite block.  Enigma msg  05:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

2 were already indef blocked, blocked the third for 24 hours. Cirt (talk) 08:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions