Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Zapatancas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Zapatancas

 * Evidence

and are all reverting Zapatero to the Zapatancas version which Zapatancas cannot do as her is banned. This user is also obsessed with harrassing SqueakBox, only Zapatancas hates SqueakBox and his hatred is enormous. etc including multiple vandalism of Squeakbox's page just like Zapatancas. This edit summary compares toi this  both want the world to know the truth about SqueakBox, Zapatancas here here here here here, Hagiographer here SqueakBox 13:00, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comments

I've not reverted to Zapatancas' version but to a version previous to SqueakBox and Zapatancas' edit war. I don't hate SqueakBox. I couldn't care less about him. What happens is that he has only posted insults since I met him without making a single comment about content. I haven't vandalised his page. I've only posted in a respectful way that he's in Personal attacks parole. That's true and has been decided by the ArbCom and he tries to hide it to continue his pattern of insults. I can only be blamed for reverting his vandalism, what he does with his identity, that of his sock puppet User:Skanking o through the anonymous User:63.245.13.231. He uses redirections to prevent articles from being edited or read and not in those cases when several titles are valid for the same article, the only case when using redirections is valid. Hagiographer 07:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

This CheckUser case shows that Haigographer and Zapatancas are unrelated. Jesse Viviano 15:07, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

That is strange, the first check user by tony Sidaways proved there was no evidence either way and given they are both using ip's from the same place this is no proof the users are not connected as they clearly are connected, SqueakBox 17:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

If the RFCU comes up inconclusive then they are not sockpuppets. Iola k ana |T 12:11, 23 July 2006 (UTC)