Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 997

Editing
How to submit for review after editing in Sandbox? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandeepjl (talk • contribs) 09:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * See the guidance at WP:Notability (films), your draft User:Sandeepjl/sandbox will not be approved if you submit it in its' current state. If you can fix that problem (reliable independent sources), see So_you_made_a_userspace_draft. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:46, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, if WP:COI and WP:PAID are relevant here, follow the instructions there. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

How to publish my "draft:Partha Pratim Moitra" article in the main namespace to be recognised by Wikipedia and other search Engines like google?
I have created a Draft:Partha Pratim Moitra logging into my account. I have clicked the Publish Page button, but after that I am not finding the article published and recognised by wikipedia or google when searched for "Partha Pratim Moitra". But it is showing the page when searched for Draft:Partha Pratim Moitra. What step I am missing to publish it in main namespace? By the way, a Wikipedia page by the same name Partha Pratim Moitra" was there, but was deleted by the request of of the page creator. Google is still showing that information. Am i missing any step? What I am supposed to do next, to publish this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brihannalasom (talk • contribs) 05:20, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi and welcome Brihannalasom! The draft article you wrote was deleted by Jimfbleak as advertising or promotion. If you have a close connection with the subject of the article, you may want to review WP:COI. As a new editor, it is highly recommended you submit your first article through WP:AFC where it can be reviewed and, if necessary, feedback can be offered. Chetsford (talk) 06:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually, Draft:Parthapratim Moitra and User:Brihannalasom/sandbox still exist, although the latter has been nominated for Speedy deletion. You can contest that, and then continue to work on either the draft or the sandbox (but not both). The Sandbox version has sections with no references.
 * Confusingly, clicking on Publish saves the document but does not publish it. There is a separate process for submitting to AfC. Once an article is accepted it will appear in Wikipedia searches, but there will be a delay before it searches with search engines see it. David notMD (talk) 09:45, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The draft which was deleted was Draft:Partha Pratim Moitra, the one to which the OP referred.  The OP apparently recreated it with a different capitalisation of the title.  --David Biddulph (talk) 09:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , thanks for ping. I've speedied them both and I'll post detailed guidance on the user's talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:24, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

New Article
First time creating an article, unfortunately declined set for deletion. best guidelines to follow? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dedangk (talk • contribs) 11:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Successfully creating a new article is probably the hardest task on Wikipedia.  It takes much effort and practice.  In your case, the draft was deleted because it did little more than tell about the lawfirm.  Wikipedia articles must do more, they must show with independent reliable sources how the subject meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability;(in this case, the definition of a notable organization)  those sources must have significant coverage of the subject, as such going beyond brief mentions, press releases, or routine announcements and listings.  Your sources seemed to consist of that, which is why it was deleted as promotional.
 * If you are associated with this lawfirm, you will need to review conflict of interest and paid editing.  If you haven't already, I would suggest reading Your First Article and use the new user tutorial.  You might also want to spend some time(weeks or months) editing existing articles in areas that interest you, to get a feel for how Wikipedia works and what is being looked for in articles, before attempting to create an article.  Newer users who do that are much more successful at article creation. 331dot (talk) 11:15, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Creating a page for John Grossman biography
I believe I am doing this all wrong in creating information of my late husband interesting life and need help. I understood that I needed to open an account - so I chose the new user as MrsJohnGrossman. 1) Was this wrong? 2) Should I have created an account with the user name of John Grossman? and if Yes, do I need to delete the first account -MrsJohnGrossman? 3) once I create or use which account correctly - Then all I do is 'upload' the bio as a 'draft'?

Thank you so much, Carolyn Grossman — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrsJohnGrossman (talk • contribs) 11:26, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello, welcome to Wikipedia! Firstly, I wouldn’t recommend creating an article on someone you know - you have a strong Conflict of Interest which is strongly discouraged. Secondly, we have guidelines on notability - is this person significant enough to have a Wikipedia article on them? Are they talked about in multiple, independent, secondary sources? In regards to your username, it is fine so don’t worry. If you have anymore questions don’t hesitate to ask. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 11:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. I think your current username is fine; "JohnGrossman" would not be acceptable since you are not him.  Accounts cannot be deleted but they can be renamed. However, you don't need to do so.
 * You should review conflict of interest before attempting to create your draft- which you can do using Articles for Creation. Before you do that, you should review Your First Article.  Please understand that your husband(please accept my condolences on your loss) would need to be shown with independent reliable sources with significant coverage to meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person.  There are also more specific criteria for certain careers(athletes, musicians, etc.).  Wikipedia is not a place to just memorialize someone or tell about their life, they must be shown to be notable as Wikipedia defines it. 331dot (talk) 11:33, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Resize Picture
I just helped a friend move her sandbox article to the main space and it went smoothly. The picture, however, is a little big and doesn't rescale well on a mobile device. How can we make it a little smaller? I don't think the width/height should be more than 300 pixels. The present height is 360 pixels. The article is Ken Kimmelman.

Also, can we make the photo title/credit flush left instead of center?

Thank you for your help. Lore E. Mariano (talk) 20:34, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If you resize the image to 300px it will be larger than its now and will appear oversized with respect to the infobox, so there's really no need for that. It's currently at the default thumbnail size of 220 pixels, the same way as hundreds of thousands images. I have also removed the credit line completely. So no need of any alignment. We don't credit images, if anyone wants see image's author they can look up that info at the file's description page. – Ammarpad (talk) 20:53, 9 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Now we are having problems with the copyright. "No file named Ken_Kimmelman_by_Amy Dienes-2012.jpg has been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons."  I thought when she uploaded it, it was stored in Commons.  Lore E. Mariano (talk) 23:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The file is there, at commons:File:Photo_of_Ken_Kimmelman_by_Amy_Dienes.jpg (you were looking at the caption rather than the file title), but it doesn't have evidence of permission from the copyright holder. - David Biddulph (talk) 07:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Got it. Thank you!  Lore E. Mariano (talk) 14:06, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Goji Berry Bush
My question is why is it stating that they aren't grown in the U.S. when I have 2 Goji Berry bushes in my backyard here in Belen, NM that are growing like crazy.. this is my 3rd harvest coming soon because it's blooming again. Out of the 1st harvest was 7 cups but took me hours, 1 cup per hour nonstop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1011:B020:C038:F8FE:D942:5158:F553 (talk) 22:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello IP editor, and welcome to the Teahouse. Which article are you actually reading? Try Goji, which clearly states: "In the first decade of the 21st century, farmers in Canada and the United States began cultivating goji on a commercial scale to meet potential markets for fresh berries, juice, and processed products." To be brutally frank with you, why on earth would you think that the world's fifth most visited website could be criticised for saying that something isn't cultivated (i.e. at a commercial level) in the US just because you happen to have a couple of plants growing in your backyard? It would need a mention of your amazing backyard horticultural endeavours to have been cited in national newspapers to merit special edits to be made to update an article about such a topic. I hope you're happy with this WP:AGF reply. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 23:30, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, if the article says "are not grown" (unqualified), the article should probably be changed to say "are not grown commercially" or something similar. In which article was this? —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 08:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It is worth remembering that we shouldn't state a negative unless a published source also states the same (or it would probably be WP:OR. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Resubmitting an article
Hi, my first submission was rejected because it was a blank submission ie. the article could not be seen by the reviewer. I was advised by the reviewer to delete any empty space at the beginning of the article, but after doing that I am unable to find the way of resubmitting the article one again for approval. Your advice on how to go about resubmitting an updated article is done is appreciated. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmedsayed6311 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Ahmedsayed6311, there is a "Resubmit" button at the end of the banner message that says it was declined. Your draft is still blank. If you do not intend to write the article yourself but only wish to suggest a subject for the new article, you should submit your article request at WP:Requested Articles instead. Usedtobecool  ✉ ✨ 08:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Now in proper place as Draft:Dr. Mohamed Sheikh Hassan but has not been submitted. Essential to add valid references before submitting. David notMD (talk) 15:43, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

My Article page "Visual-CFD" is not being published
I have been following my article page to publish from 7-8 months, the purpose of the page is not the advertisement. It is for use of the many aspirant of the opensource solver OpenFOAM. Although it is developed by ESI Group but those who can benefit from it with the information should be justiced with this publicaton. Please let me know if anything is miising in the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srp1220 (talk • contribs) 11:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Your draft Draft:Visual-CFD has not been submitted so cannot be reviewed. Theroadislong (talk) 11:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * ... and don't forget that you need references to published reliable sources independent of the subject. - David Biddulph (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello,, and welcome to the Teahouse. Like many people, you have a misunderstanding of what Wikipedia is. Wikipedia articles are for the benefit of Wikipedia (and hence for all its readers). If you write or edit an article for the benefit of anybody, or any group, in particular, you are probably doing it wrong. If I interpret you correctly, you are wanting to give information which is of use specifically to users of that software: but Wikipedia is not a manual. --ColinFine (talk) 15:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Looking for help with the Top 25 Report
Hi; I'm semi-retired from the weekly report of the top 25 most viewed articles on Wikipedia, though I do still step in from time to time to offer advice to my successors. I have been worried recently, since it seems most of my successors have fallen away and the job appears to have fallen heavily on the shoulders of User:Igordebraga, who is burning out a bit. I was wondering, would anyone be interested in sharing the burden, if only for a little while. I would but I have outside commitments. If you'd like advice on how to do it, however, I'd be happy to help :)  Serendi pod ous  01:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I could potentially help out with this, maybe only short-term for now, but longer-term if I can handle it. Do you want to give me some more info at my talk page on what needs doing? Hugsyrup 07:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for seeking help. It's not as much burning out, given I'm still motivated (even if finding how to write more on things that repeat over and over is a challenge), but frustration that for all the past collaborators - just look at the annual list - no one else is appearing. Come to the report, people! You can joke, complain about current affairs, and get unorthodox. Indians are particularly welcome. igordebraga ≠ 16:28, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Have you considered asking WT:INDIA? 2.51.186.242 (talk) 16:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

TweakTown article creation rejection
Hi there,

A submission result for an article I wrote for TweakTown was deleted with message ''G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion''.

Any suggestions, please? Here is the text:

TweakTown is an online technology website owned by Tweak Town Pty Ltd. It was founded in 1999 by Cameron Wilmot. The website provides detailed technology and gaming news, reviews, articles, and guides. Various contributors from the United States and Australia extensively test new computer parts and present their opinion on the test subjects on devices such as CPUs, motherboards, video cards, solid state drives, coolers, and other items. Its content has been cited by other technology websites such as The Inquirer. and TechRadar. .

The site includes a forum which provides a source of knowledge for users with technical questions regarding motherboards and more. The site also includes a section named Ask the Experts which allows its readers to submit questions and contributors of the site answer the questions.

TweakTown holds its annual media party at Computex Taipei in Taiwan. During its Computex Taipei 2019 media party, the site celebrated its 20th anniversary. TweakTown attended its first Computex in 2000 and in 2017 had its own media booth at the show where overclocking was conducted. TweakTown also attends other events including the Consumer Electronics Show, Flash Memory Summit, and Gamescom.

As of August 2019, SimilarWeb displays TweakTown with a global rank of #65 in the Computers Electronics and Technology category.

== History ==

During its early days, TweakTown was known as Wilmot's Website and was managed and operated solely by Cameron Wilmot who was still in high school at the time. As time progressed, more contributors started providing content on the site. Wilmot's Website launched in 1998 and was renamed to TweakTown in 1999. During that time, the site domain name was purchased and a new design was created. The site has since undergone many site redesigns and includes work from many past and present contributors in the United States and Australia.

During the devastating floods of Queensland in 2011, TweakTown built a gaming computer which was raffled off and its community donated funds to the value of $6289.77 Australian dollars to the Queensland Flood Appeal.

== See also ==
 * AnandTech
 * Maximum PC
 * The Tech Report
 * Tom's Hardware
 * List of Internet forums
 * Computex

citation: access date value
Hi. I'm a little confused about access date value in citations and can't find a guideline page for it. For example, when adding an archived copy of a dead reference, should I add a new access date? Harley.M.X (talk) 18:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Greetings,, and welcome to the Teahouse. Yes, when you verify a URL or provide a valid archived copy, you should update the access date. That date indicates the last time that the particular URL or archived copy was validated to exist and support the article content, which you apparently just did. There is documentation on this at Cite web and other citation templates, but not a great deal of it. The documentation for access-date on Cite web is access-date: Full date when the content pointed to by url was last verified to support the text in the article. I hope this helps!  C Thomas3   (talk) 18:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * very helpful, thanks a lot! Harley.M.X (talk) 19:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

getting an article on wikipedia
hi i'm trying to contact wikipedia for my employer. She basically wants to get a tribute for her deceased husband who wrote 146 books (study-guide books for The Bible) & created a non-profit business to give them away for free. She is still doing that for anyone that asks. His website God'sPuzzleSolved.com shows up on Google when his name, Art Mokarow, is searched. -Is there any way to get a multi-page Tribute article and his photo uploaded on wikipedia when his name is searched? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.170.202.226 (talk) 17:34, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If the purpose is promotional, then no. See also WP:Conflict of interest editing.  With those in mind, you would need to first use WP:Reliable sources to determine if her late husband qualifies under our WP:Notability guidelines.   That's not everything, but it will get you started with the immediate steps.  The TeaHouse volunteers may have other ideas. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 17:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia does not have "tribute articles", and is not a place to memorialize someone, no matter what good works they may have done. Wikipedia only summarizes what independent reliable sources state with significant coverage about a subject that meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Wikipedia has no interest in enhancing search results for any subject or person. Are there independent sources that discuss this man? 331dot (talk) 17:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Since you are here representing your employer, you will need to review and comply with WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 17:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * What you created Draft:Tribute to Art Mokarow is not what Wikipedia is about and should be deleted. David notMD (talk) 21:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia Page
I have created a page for Farha Ayaz Ghani, but could not find on google. Not able to understand whats wrong. Can u help me ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WPSKKhan (talk • contribs) 12:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You created a sandbox page, not an article. Follow the instructions at WP:AFC to get that page turned into an article.  You might also want to review this guide I wrote on writing articles to make sure that you're ready for your draft to be nominated as an article.
 * Also, we're not connected to Google, so we have no say in how long it takes for an article to show up on there. Ian.thomson (talk) 12:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi and welcome to the Teahouse. You created a draft in your own sandbox at User:WPSKKhan/sandbox, which is not part of the visible Wikipedia. I have moved the page to the draftspace at Draft:Farha Ayaz Ghani and added a template to it that places it in the review queue of Articles for creation. That way, an experienced user will review your draft and if accepted, place it in the mainspace, where it then can be found. Please have a bit of patience for the review to take place. Regards So  Why  12:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * , please note that references should follow the statements which they support. When you write something like "Farha Ayaz[5] belongs to a medical family, her mother is a famous Urdu writer", no-one can be sure what reference 5 is cited in support of. Maproom (talk) 21:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

I would like to ask for help in writing an article about my boss.
Can some one write an article about my boss. I can pay for the service. I just need to get him a bio page on wikipedia. similar to Calvin Kline, Steve Wynn, or ?

Thank you. Please feel free to contact me  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlebang1 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Quite frankly, Wikipedia is not concerned with your job duties, or what your boss has asked you to do. The vast majority of us here are volunteers who want to help build this encyclopedia for the benefit of humanity.  This is just that- an encyclopedia- and not a place to merely tell about someone or post their resume.  As an encyclopedia, we are interested in summarizing what independent reliable sources with significant coverage state about article subjects shown to meet our special definition of notability(more specifically, our definition of notable people).  Wikipedia is not interested in what an article subject wants to say about itself.  The fact that other persons meet our definition of notability does not automatically mean your boss does too. See other stuff exists.  This is not social media where everyone and anyone can write about themselves. Keep in mind that an article is not necessarily desirable.  There are good reasons to not want one.  Anything, good or bad, can be in an article about your boss as long as it appears in an independent source.  You cannot prevent others from editing it, nor lock it to the text your boss might prefer. Feel free to show your boss this message.  The best thing to do is to allow independent editors to notice the career of your boss and write about them of their own choosing.
 * Wikipedia editors are volunteers. There are people and companies out there that offer the service of writing a Wikipedia article, but those are not endorsed or supported by Wikipedia.  If you hire someone to write an article, they would need to disclose that and who is paying them per our paid editing policy.  Paying someone would not remove the notability requirement, nor the requirement of independent reliable sources.  Beware in persons who demand payment up front; despite what they might say, no one can make you any guarantees(such as writing an article that will not be deleted). 331dot (talk) 00:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * You yourself will also need to comply with the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy. 331dot (talk) 00:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Check other's online status
Greetings! First, THANK YOU for volunteering at the TeaHouse! Is there a way to see if specific other users are online? In this case, I recently had help from a file mover and would write them directly if they are doing wiki now. Thanks NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 17:30, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, and welcome to the Teahouse. We don't ever reveal who is or is not online. However, if you have a particular editor in mind, you could go to their user page, click the "User Contributions" link on the left hand side of the page (in desktop view). You can see their latest edits and match the timestamp to the current time. This gives your a broad sense of when they were last active. But all you need do is post a message on their Talk Page and they'll get a notification when they're next online and logged in. I hope this helps. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * As far as I know, you cannot, but it would be useful to look at their contributions to see if they have edited recently (in the past 5 mins or so) so that you can make a judgement from there. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 21:21, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * To view a user’s contributions easily, click Preferences at the top of any Wikipedia page. Then click the Gadgets section. Scroll down to Appearance and tick the MoreMenu box before saving. Now, go onto the user’s page and click the ‘User’ tab next to the ‘View History’ tab at the top of the page. Then select Contributions. If you have anymore questions, don’t hesitate to ask. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 21:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Some users, especially sysops/admins, may hang out on the IRC channels. —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 22:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

✅ Much thanks everyone! NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 00:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Fair Use Images
Hello, I'm currently working on an article about a series of art books. I would very much like to show the covers of the books, (done by contemporary artists), but I don't own the copyrights. I see other series on Wikipedia ("The Best Science Fiction of the Year") where the cover for each book is shown and were uploaded under the Fair Use criteria. I cannot find how or where to upload "Fair Use" images. What do I have to do in order to post the covers? Thank you very much for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpvicas (talk • contribs) 20:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Wikipedia does allow some non-free content to be uploaded and used in articles, but each use of such content is required to meet Wikipedia's non-free use content. With respect to copyrighted content like book covers, album covers, etc., item 1 of Wikipedia:Non-free content does in general allow copyrighted cover art to be uploaded and used, but pretty much only when the image is used for primary identification purposes in a stand-alone article about the work in question; so, a copyrighted book cover is generally deemed OK when it's used for primary identification purposes at the top of a stand-alone Wikipedia article about the book in question. Other types of non-free uses or use in other types of articles tends to be much harder to justify for the reasons given Wikipedia:Non-free content; it's not impossible to justify such non-free usage, but it can be pretty hard and typically requires that the cover art itself be the subject of sourced critical commentary in the article so that the context for non-free use required by Wikipedia non-free content use criterion #8 is clearly provided. In other words, simply discussing the book or mentioning by name in another article is usually not going to be seen as a sufficient justification for using a non-free image of the book's cover. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. Using the covers for identification is exactly what I want to do. I will have a Main Article which describes the series as a whole, and then have an individual page for each volume in the series describing its contents. The cover photos would be used on each volume page for identification. But I still need to know how to do this. Where do I go and how do I upload the images as "Fair Use" images? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpvicas (talk • contribs) 01:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You can use Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard to upload the files to Wikipedia, but you will first need to download the photos to your computer. If you find the wizard to be too confusing, you might then try asking for help at Wikipedia:Files for upload. In general, you will need to make sure the file(s) you upload has two things: a file copyright license and a non-free use rationale. If you use the Upload Wizard you should be given options as to both, but you can always tweak the licensing/non-free use rationale manually after the upload has been completed by just editing the relevant file's page. I suggest using Non-free book cover for the copyright license and Non-free use rationale book cover for the non-free use rationale. You should typically only need one copyright license for a file, but you will need to provide a separate specific non-free use rationale for each non-free use of a file (note this is per use, not per article where the file is used). You should try to only use files from official sources whenever possible to aid in copyright verification, etc. per WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. If you've got any other questions about this, you can ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions or Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Why hasn't my draft been reviewed and article concerns
Hi there, it has been three months since I submitted my draft on action teaching to AFC and it has not yet been reviewed. I was wondering if there was any way to tell why this is, if this is normal, how long I should anticipate waiting, how to expedite the process, etc. I have disclosed on my user page that I produced this article as a part of an internship at my university, although that internship has now ended. Also, I was doing some further reading and was wondering if my draft is more of a stub than an article? And I was also wondering if my draft needs more secondary, independent sources. If you notice anything else that could be of use, that would also be great. Thanks for your help! Tleclair96 (talk) 02:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Draft:Action Teaching is one of thousands of submissions in the queue now. Please be patient. As I looked at it, it did not seem that your draft demonstrates the notability of its subject. Better secondary sources should be sought.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Posting images
how to post a picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santhosh tamilnadu 626 (talk • contribs) 06:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! To upload an image to Wikimedia Commons read Uploading images and How to upload a photo - this process can be a little hard so, if you have difficulties, please don’t hesitate to return and ask for help. You must make sure it is within our copyright guidelines - it must be your own image in most cases. Once that is done, read Picture tutorial for how to add an image. Its a good idea to discuss adding the image before you do it, so that it is not removed. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 06:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Google Books
Is Google books a reliable source? -- CptViraj (📧) 05:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Google Books might be considered to be a reliable source for certain content about itself, but most likely not for other things. Some of the books hosted/found on Google Books, however, could be considered to be reliable sources about certain subjects if they satisfy WP:RS. In such cases, you'd basciallly be citing the book in question as the source and perhaps using Google Books as a convenience link simply to make verifying the source a bit easier. You don't need to do this per WP:SAYWHERE as long as the book meets WP:PUBLISHED, but it can make it easier for others to verify the source. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:24, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Gotcha! Thanks. -- CptViraj (📧) 07:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Let me expand a little bit, . Google Books tries to index all published books, with greater or lesser success. Some of those books are reliable and others aren't. Google Books is great at feeding you bibliographic details but less decisive in assessing reliability. What's the reputation of the author? What's the assessment of the publisher? How has the specific article been received in terms of reliability? All these factors enter into the assessment. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  07:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, Thank you for explaining. -- CptViraj (📧) 07:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism help
I recently discovered vandalism in the first line of the Ariana Grande page. The page is locked to prevent vandalism so I couldn’t correct it. Could someone else fix it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbedwar (talk • contribs) 07:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for spotting that vandalism. I've reverted it.   Dbfi<i style="color: #4e4;">r</i><i style="color: #4a4">s</i>  07:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

St. Paul's School, Darjeeling
Regarding the data provided on Wikipedia about St. Paul's school Darjeeling, the names of a few eminent past students have not been included. Also, the names of past rectors of the school ends abruptly with Mr. Hair Dang. There were others after him.

How does one go about having the above edited into the existing data?

Regards,

Jaswant Ch. Something (Old Paulite 1967- 1977) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.207.49.232 (talk) 08:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello there, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for spotting somewhere that may need expanding in an article. You can Be Bold and edit yourself. However, if you would like to know how to edit see Help:Editing or take the Tutorial. In regards to the edit in question, you will need a reliable source to back up the changes you want to make. This is under our core policy of Verifiability, a policy that, if not followed, will most likely get your edit reverted. I hope that helps, if you have anymore questions please ask. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 08:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Also, you have a connection with the subject meaning there is a small but definite Conflict of Interest, please clink the blue link to read about this. If you feel like WP:COI or anything else prevents you from editing the article, just add a note on the article’s Talk Page and someone knowledgeable on the subject should be able to help you out. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 08:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Accusations of wrongdoing published on Wikipedia
Does Wikipedia allow mentions of accusations or indictments that are published in the media about living people? Example, can content about as yet unproven crimes be included in Wiki articles that are biographies of living people?111.91.2.108 (talk) 08:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Wikipedia has a strict policy about how living people are written about, which you can see for yourself at WP:BLP.  There is a specific section related to crimes, at WP:BLPCRIME.  I could give a better answer if you wanted to share which article you are concerned about(though you don't need to)- but accusations are generally not appropriate for article content, especially if the person is not a well known public figure, such as a government official or celebrity like Jeffrey Epstein(who was also a convicted criminal anyway).   Something formal like an indictment is more likely to merit inclusion, as long as the text is clearly phrased to make it clear that the person is only indicted. 331dot (talk) 09:09, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I am also aware that some countries like New Zealand have laws against publishing or discussing the names/identities of criminal suspects before(and if) they are convicted. While these laws are not necessarily binding on Wikipedia(as it is physically located largely in the United States), they would affect the abilities of those countries' citizens to make such edits. 331dot (talk) 09:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Company Wikipedia page
Hi there,

I'm wondering how to go about getting a company Wikipedia page - I've spoken to a few people and had different messages and warnings from each. We launched in 2014 but don't yet have a wiki page.

Please can someone point me in the direction of some help please?

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.187.164.182 (talk) 09:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. You seem to have a common misconception about what Wikipedia is. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a forum to merely tell about a company. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state about subjects that meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability(in this case, that of a notable company). Wikipedia has no interest in what a company wants to say about itself, and has no interest in enhancing search results. We do not have "company pages", we have articles about companies. Furthermore, you have a conflict of interest; you will also need to comply with the paid editing policy(this is mandatory). It would be best if you allowed independent editors to take note of your company in independent reliable sources and write about it. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

How to create a new Wikipedia page for a person?
Could you please, help me out to create my own first article about myself! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diwakar P Yadav (talk • contribs) 05:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * First of all, creating an article about yourself is Strongly discouraged. If you really want to do that, Start by reading WP:YFA. I recommend using Articles for Creation submission system to ensure that the article is ready for mainspace when it gets moved there (Yes, its possible to use a different way, but the chances that someone sends it to AFD are much higher then). 2001:16B8:50A4:D900:EC2D:6E8D:EED4:E45F (talk) 06:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The major question is are you famous enough that other people have published articles about you? Having a successful career in your area of expertise - including published articles and books - does not qualify as notable for Wikipedia. David notMD (talk) 11:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Watchlist - preferences settings - highlighting
I've recently made some cavalier tweaks to preferences and now I seem to have broken my watchlist. Specifically, changes I have not reviewed USED to be bolded but now the whole thing is in normal font. I have expanded to all changes (not just the most recent) and hid bots and categorization. Can't seem to find anything about flagging the un-reviewed diffs. Any ideas? (I also recently added a browser add-on (NoScript) but disabled it before posting here, so that's not the cause.) NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 12:40, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Welcome back, . Assuming I have understood your question correctly, I think what you need to do is go to Special:Preferences and then 'Gadgets' and look for the section there labelled 'Watchlist'. Find and tick the box labelled Display pages on your watchlist that have changed since your last visit in bold (see customizing watchlists for more options). That should now display watchlist pages in bold that have changed since you last viewed them. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ Much thanks, Nick! If the world made sense the tab for "watchlist" would mention there is a related dookickie on the gadgets tab. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Username color
Why does my username appear in red?IAMrocknroll (talk) 14:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello. Your username appears red because it is red linked, wherein you don’t have a user page. You are welcome to make one, so that your username will appear in blue. <b style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; background-color: #420a6fff; color: #e062d8ff;">LPS and MLP Fan</b> (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 14:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Welcome to Teahouse. I have placed a "welcome message on your talk page" and now you could see your "talk" is in blue colour. If you write something on your usepage - here], you name will turn "blue colour". Cheers.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 14:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Impossible to add a URL as External Links (Spam filter blocked it)
Hello everyone, I am new here and I tried to edit a page and add an additional external link that was relevant but it was refused when I tried to publish my changes.

This is the message: ''The text you wanted to save was blocked by the spam filter. This is probably caused by a link to a blacklisted external site. The following text is what triggered our spam filter: cgap.org''

Can you help me to solve this issue?

Many thanks for your help.

Noel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noel92140 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You should not add any links to this site. Ruslik_ Zero 14:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * More info at Spam blacklist. If you think you have a sufficient argument for using your link, there's guidance there where to make it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:24, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello
I recently created an article called Pembroke Aircraft Leasing 4 Ltd and Kieran Corr. It was deleted and my edits from it disappeared. What happened? ThePacificMan (talk) 13:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * There is absolutely no need to use profanities here (or indeed elsewhere on Wikipedia). I have removed it from your question, and will now take a look to try to answer you. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Right, first off, have you read the long explanations left on you talk page about both these subjects? They explain that we have a process called 'speedy deletion' which can be applied to various types of pages which are promotional or do not demonstrate any measure of significance (WP:NOTABILITY) and both of these pages were deleted on those grounds. I'm not an administrator, so I cannot see the deleted content. But because the page has been deleted all of your edits - or anyone else's edits to that page - would also have been deleted. You can contest the deletion of either page or ask the deleting editor to send you a copy of the contents by email if that is important to you (details in those talk page messages). Sorry I can't give you more satisfactory answer, but you can read more about this process at this page. In future, you might like to create a draft and to work on that until it's ready, and then submit it to Articles For Creation. There, it will be reviewed and feedback given to you if it doesn't yet meet our criteria. This is a far less risky process than putting it straight in the encyclopedia and chancing it being speedily removed, as has happened here, I'm afraid. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much. ThePacificMan (talk) 13:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I would have said "you're very welcome" as I like to help people. But I see you feel it was acceptable to reinstate your use of a quite unecessary profanity here. This is a friendly space, read by new editors of all ages, many of them minors. Do you think that's a very mature or responsible thing to do? Please self-revert if you seriously expect to receive help and assistance from hosts like me here in future. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Of course, that's not to say that draft space is immune from speedy. Speedy deletion is applied for inappropriate content even in draft and user spaces, promotional/spammy material and copyright violations for instance. But some other stuff that's speedied in article space can survive longer as draft to give time for improvement, including articles that have notability issues. Usedtobecool  ✉ ✨ 15:56, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Why my article is delince
Can say me the details where is error and why delince how to fix the error — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yungdom1 (talk • contribs) 16:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome, Yungdom1! Your article draft was declined because it doesn't meet Wikipedia's minimum standards for inline citations. You can read more about correct citation here. Please also read WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY and WP:COI, if either of these apply to you. Chetsford (talk) 16:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Specifically, the material under "Controversy" is contentious, so it must have an inline citation. <b style="color:#556B2F">William2001</b>(<b style="color:#008080">talk</b>) 16:40, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

What would be the decision of UNSC regarding the current situation in Kashmir in general and the Kashmir issue in particular?
Tomorrow at 10: am in the morning the UNSC is going to decide the fate of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. The meeting will be a close door meeting in which the five permanent members of the UN security Council viz. USA, Russia, China, UK and France will be participating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahid Ashraf Rather (talk • contribs) 16:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia or I cannot answer that question. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, meaning that this encyclopedia cannot be used to predict future and possible events. Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable information. <b style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; background-color: #420a6fff; color: #e062d8ff;">LPS and MLP Fan</b> (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 16:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

contesting speedy deletion
how can I contest a sppedy deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brihannalasom (talk • contribs) 17:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Go to the page that is tagged for deletion, and click the button that says “Contest this speedy deletion”. <b style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; background-color: #420a6fff; color: #e062d8ff;">LPS and MLP Fan</b> (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 17:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Should images be moved to avoid breaking section heading lines?
I've compiled bulleted lists of prehistoric life by US state: example. When an entry in one of these lists has an associated image, the image code is placed between the bullet and the name of the prehistoric life-form, per the manual of style. Unfortunately, if the list entry is late in the alphabet within a section the image spills over into the next section and breaks the horizontal line in the next section's heading. I was wondering if it was more important from a manual of style perspective to keep placement of an image within the associated individual list entry or if these images should be moved to an entry earlier in the list to prevent breaking the subsequent section heading line. Abyssal (talk) 13:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Please, do not worry about breaking section lines. Ruslik_ Zero 14:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Placing at the end of the section will ensure the next section starts after any content from the previous one. —[  Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 17:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Discography
I'm thinking of creating a discography page for Bea Miller because she has two albums, four EPs, and over 10 singles. I would like to know how you move all the discography to a new page. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 16:50, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Billiekhalidfan that doesn't sound like enough content to merit splitting, especially considering the artist article already looks like a discography page. I advise proposing this at the artists talk page because if you create the discography page anyway, you'll need to make substantial deletions from the artist article to avoid content duplication. As for how to do it, you can simply copy content from the artist page to the new page, provided your edit summary provides attribution with something like "this content was copied from that page, see the history of that page for authorship information". Usedtobecool  ✉ ✨ 18:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Photographs
Are the photographs copyrighted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:30C0:74E0:F892:5875:D81E:678E (talk) 20:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Which photographs? Wikipedia assumes that all photographs are copyright by the photographer unless it can be shown otherwise.  The photographer can release copyright when they upload a photo to Wikipedia Commons.  See Uploading images for guidance.  If you want to use photographs from Wikipedia Commons, then that is permitted if you acknowledge the source.  Photographs hosted on Wikipedia itself might be under "Fair use" so will be copyright and may not be used elsewhere.  <i style="color: blue;">D</i><i style="color: #0cf;">b</i><i style="color: #4fc;">f</i><i style="color: #6f6;">i</i><i style="color: #4e4;">r</i><i style="color: #4a4">s</i>  20:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

How can I stop the speedy deletion of my article, and request for reconsidering the matter?
There was a page by some other person on one of my favourite film activist and poet. May be some of his family members opened this page and when he came to know of this page he himself requested for speedy deletion.

I have no connection with him, but I am become impressed by his biography. So I opened a page in his name with more specific details. But that page has also been speedily deleted. Is it like that, no information on him will be allowed from now on. He is a well known political and film activist, and people should know about the informations I furnished.

Please suggest me what I am to stop the speedy deletion of my article, and request for reconsidering the matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brihannalasom (talk • contribs) 17:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Brihannalasom, there is an important question in need of answering. How did you come to know of the "more specific details"? Usedtobecool  ✉ ✨ 18:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You cannot stop the speedy deletion of an article which has not yet been written. There is nothing to "reconsider". You can prevent speedy deletion by demonstrating that the subject of the article deserves an article in Wikipedia by adhering to WP:notability and WP:Reliable sources.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Can my biography appear on Wikipedia if I'm a YouTube artist?
Can my biography appear on Wikipedia if I'm YouTube artist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.246.25.246 (talk) 16:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * 41.246.25.246 - hello and welcome! Your, or anyone's, biography can appear on <Del>YouTube Wikipedia regardless of your profession but provided you meet the guidelines for notability and verification. However, it is generally recommended you do not contribute content in which you have an intimate or pecuniary interest. In your specific case, please review WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. Chetsford (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, . Writing about yourself is a big mistake. You have a conflict of interest since you want to write about yourself. Also, you may not be notable enough to be worthy of inclusion in this encyclopedia. <b style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; background-color: #420a6fff; color: #e062d8ff;">LPS and MLP Fan</b> (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 17:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Merely being someone with a channel on YouTube does not merit that person an article. You would need to be extensively written about in independent reliable sources that indicate how you are notable as a person. 331dot (talk) 20:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Reverting a article in a phone
How can I revert in a phone? Is it possible or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CentralTime301 (talk • contribs)
 * Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Reverting on a phone is no different than reverting on a computer- if you are accessing the desktop version on your phone(instead of using the mobile version). There should be a link at the bottom of the mobile version for you to switch to the desktop version. 331dot (talk) 20:59, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure reverts can be made on mobile so, like 331dot said, you will have to switch to desktop mode. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 21:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)