Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 August 25/User templates

Script to make substitutions go easier
See User:BigDT/monobook.js. Hit view source and copy the stuff into your monobook.js. It will give you a nice script to replace these things. Note that I'm using the javascript replace function and I haven't put code in there for all of the userboxes ... so if you are working on a different box, you may need to edit the replace command and put in the box you are actually working on. BigDT 17:47, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

General discussion
Have only the transclousions been changed or other links as well? (It wouldn't be any good if any of these were still listed in those lists of userboxes that are around somewhere) Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 08:06, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * They have been removed from the various user template lists. - LA @ 08:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Time zone user templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10 (Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 20:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

These templates have basically the same information, so a master template was created that could handle variables to make it say the same thing those below say all in one template. The master template also has additional features which the originals do not have. Please note, I like user templates and hope that the reduction of them will help keep them in Template space where they belong. The users have been given at least a week of notice that the master was available. - LA @ 07:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

replaces...

Time zone discussion

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Microsoft Windows version user templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deletion of all. RyanG e rbil10 (Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 20:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

These templates have basically the same information, so the base template was modified so that it could handle variables to make it say the same thing those below say all in one template. They have no transclusions. Please note, I like user templates and hope that the reduction of them will help keep them in Template space where they belong. - LA @ 07:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

replaces...
 * - redirect to User winxp
 * - redirect to User winxp
 * - redirect to User winxp
 * - redirect to User xp64
 * - redirect to User OS:Microsoft Windows Server 2003
 * - redirect to User winxp
 * - redirect to User winxp
 * - redirect to User winxp
 * - redirect to User xp64
 * - redirect to User OS:Microsoft Windows Server 2003
 * - redirect to User winxp
 * - redirect to User winxp
 * - redirect to User winxp
 * - redirect to User xp64
 * - redirect to User OS:Microsoft Windows Server 2003
 * - redirect to User winxp
 * - redirect to User xp64
 * - redirect to User OS:Microsoft Windows Server 2003
 * - redirect to User xp64
 * - redirect to User OS:Microsoft Windows Server 2003
 * - redirect to User xp64
 * - redirect to User OS:Microsoft Windows Server 2003
 * - redirect to User OS:Microsoft Windows Server 2003

Microsoft Windows discussion

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Blog user templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deletion of redundant templates. RyanG e rbil10 (Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 20:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC) These templates have basically the same information, so the base template was modified so that it could handle variables to make it say the same thing the one beside it said. Please note, I like user templates and hope that the reduction of them will help keep them in Template space where they belong. The users have been given at least a week of notice that the master was available. - LA @ 07:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

replaces

replaces

replaces

replaces

replaces

Blog discussion

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Jabber user template

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10 (Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 20:43, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

This template has basically the same information, so the base template was modified so that it could handle variables to make it say the same thing the one beside it said. Please note, I like user templates and hope that the reduction of them will help keep them in Template space where they belong. The users have been given at least a day or two of notice that the master was available. - LA @ 07:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

replaces

Jabber discussion

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Star Wars episode user templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deletion of all. RyanG e rbil10 (Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 20:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

These templates have basically the same information, so a master template was created that could handle variables to make it say the same thing those below say all in one template. The master template alone is neutral, so should not be devisive. They have no transclusions. Please note, I like user templates and hope that the reduction of them will help keep them in Template space where they belong. - LA @ 07:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

replaces...

Star Wars discussion

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Stargate user templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deletion of all. RyanG e rbil10 (Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 20:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

These templates have basically the same information, so a master template was created that could handle variables to make it say the same thing those below say all in one template. The master template also has additional features which the originals do not have. They have no transclusions. Please note, I like user templates and hope that the reduction of them will help keep them in Template space where they belong. - LA @ 07:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

replaces...

Stargate discussion

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

CSI user templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deletion of all. RyanG e rbil10 (Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 20:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

These templates have basically the same information, so a master template was created that could handle variables to make it say the same thing those below say all in one template. Please note, I like user templates and hope that the reduction of them will help keep them in Template space where they belong. The users have been given at least a few days of notice that the master was available. - LA @ 07:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

replaces...

CSI discussion

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.