Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 May 2



May 2, 2006

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep and deprecate Circeus 17:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:Booland
All of these templates are unnecessary with the new ParserFunctions. Most uses have already been converted. – ABCDe ✉ 20:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Migrat off and delete - Convert existing uses and delete. --larsinio ( poke )( prod ) 14:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Deprecate and keep - I don't think we need to delete these, but I agree that uses of them should be converted and the templates marked as deprecated. Also, note that ParserFunctions actually doesn't include XOR and some of the other logical operators. Just the basic OR, AND, NOT, and 'equal'. --CBDunkerson 15:27, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Note that to do an xor, could become something like  (and yes, that is provably correct) – ABCDe ✉ 19:11, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I actually got into a bit of an argument with Tim about xor as an operator, see the talk page at ParserFunctions. IIRC he said getting xor was as simple as doing a "not" on an "or" operation. —Locke Cole • t • c 05:22, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Deprecate/Keep. —Locke Cole • t • c 19:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Deprecate and weak keep per Locke. --Slgrandson 20:00, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. These should be kept until parser functions are done being tested, then deprecated and kept. —  xaosflux  Talk  14:30, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep (deprecated) for now. ParserFunctions is a baby still. Why is everyone in a rush to get rid of the old stuff? Also of course you don't need every logical function, but XOR is   not   (which would be NOR) or you could do   or   or... Kotepho 14:06, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and deprecate --Emc² ( CONTACT ME ) 14:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Is anybody going to help enforce the deprecation? How are we going to prevent idiots from repopulating the whatlinkshere lists? Delete, or at least move out of template space. — May. 12, '06 [23:47] <[ freakofnurxture]|[ talk]>
 * See Template:Qif... notice the absence of new items on the whatlinkshere list? Also see WP:CIVIL in reference to "idiots". --CBDunkerson 23:56, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Why are you assuming that "idiots" refers to you? Guilt? — May. 13, '06 [00:32] <[ freakofnurxture]|[ talk]>
 * That's easy enough to solve. Orphan it, then blank it and protect it, don't delete it. Much like qif, these should be kept for historical purposes. —Locke Cole • t • c 01:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and deprecate. Stifle (talk) 16:06, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by User:RHaworth Circeus 21:16, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:PhilCollLeagues
I've created this, but I've removed it already from article pages and used categories instead. If possible speedily delete. Circa 1900 09:45, 2 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete Circeus 21:16, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:Infobox British WWI division
No longer used, obsoleted by Infobox Military Unit. Kirill Lok s h in 00:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --larsinio ( poke )( prod ) 16:15, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nolonger in use. &mdash;ERcheck @ 22:51, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.