Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 October 4



Template:Pokemon

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10 (Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 02:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Unused, seems to be the result of a user trying to make edits to the article Ash Ketchum. Graham 87 08:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Transcluding itself is a giveaway; it looks like a failed attempt to add an infobox to an article by instead writing a new template with prefilled parameters that transcludes itself. (This happens a lot more often than I expected...) --ais523 10:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Party shading/Pro-Jacksonian2

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete by author request.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt; 



Unused; created as a temporary solution to duplicated color shading. G1076 17:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong support for speedy deletion. I created this template, but there is no longer any need for it.—Markles 13:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox Magazine2

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10 (Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 02:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Fork of template:Infobox Magazine. Unused. Would have to be converted to not using hiddenStructure if it must be kept. Was only used in Copeia. Ligulem 00:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, do not make template forks.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  16:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.