Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 September 17



September 17

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete all // Pilotguy  ( Have your say ) 19:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Template:user sil

 * user sil
 * user sil-n
 * user sil-4
 * user sil-3
 * user sil-2
 * user sil-1
 * user sil-n
 * user sil-4
 * user sil-3
 * user sil-2
 * user sil-1

I was cleaning Babel templates on pl.wiki. I searched wiki's for proper code for Silesian language and I found: si, sil, sli and pl-sl on diffrent pages (mostly added by IP's). Those codes means: When I changed wrong code si to pl-sl (same of language specialist (pol. językoznawców)) describe them as Silesia dialect) user user:LUCPOL asked me to revert my changes. I told him that si is code reserved for Sinhala. Then he changed all templates to sil code. When I showed him sil code on en.wiki he added Silesian to list of ISO 639:s codes and made templates and categories for Silesian language with sil (Sisaala) code. I reverted some his changes, but I can't delete wrong templates and categories. I plan to have a discussion on pl.wiki about code for silesian language. Wrong code (sil) on en.wiki may be an argument for wrong code on pl.wiki. PS. I added some categories in this TfD request becase they are part of those templates only so I ask for deletion of these categories as unused if templates go through. --Malarz pl 06:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * si - Sinhala language
 * sil - Sisaala language
 * sli - Silesian German (it's not Silesian language)
 * pl-sl - Silesian dialect of Polish language

Template:American Idol runner-ups


Well, firstly, it's runners-up. Two or three templates like this have already gone through templates for deletion in the past, and all have been deleted. The consensus was that this template is redundant and pretentious. See Templates for deletion/Log/2006 July 17. &mdash;7.souls 19:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Michael 00:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Chrisbrl88 07:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Australian Networks


These templates are not in use on any articles, and if they need to be used now, the image and text can just be copied off another article. J Ditalk 20:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete but why not prod? --Roninbk 07:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Technically speaking I don't think 's supposed to be used on templates; however, I'm not sure how much that rule is followed nowadays. --ais523 10:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Mailer Diablo 15:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.