Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 April 16



Template:New World Order/nWo

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was to keep. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 02:23, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Useless subpage of non-existant parent page. — TJ Spyke 23:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The template appears to have been misnamed, as it is based on New World Order (professional wrestling). I can figure that the creator of this template saw that the group was referred to by both their full name and acronym, so they put the slash there as a sort of "either/or" sort of thing. If properly formatted, the template can work well as a navbox for a topic which currently does not have one. I have therefore reformatted the template and fixed the title. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 00:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Ikiroid matt91486 05:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Latest preview release/LX/LuelinX

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 02:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

The article using this template was deleted due to notability concerns. No reason to keep its related template. --- RockMFR 22:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom  RogueNinja talk  23:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. –Pomte 05:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Latest stable release/LX/LuelinX

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 02:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

The article using this template was deleted due to notability concerns. No reason to keep its related template. --- RockMFR 22:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom  RogueNinja talk  23:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. –Pomte 05:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Footer Movies Nick Krasnic

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. — freak([ talk]) 04:40, Apr. 23, 2007 (UTC)

is broken but doesn't seem to fit a speedy catagory. Created by subject and therefore has COI issues and I came across it while checking through their contributions. adds nothing encyclopedic Delete — Spartaz Humbug! 22:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom  RogueNinja talk  23:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete template adds no singnificant importance and is useless  Vagish  T  CVPS 09:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Santa Maria, Bulacan

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. — freak([ talk]) 04:37, Apr. 23, 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Although significant place-names may have their own Wikipedia article, I think this one is trying to overstep those bounds. Adding a template that invites attention to create articles about Philippine barangays (municipal district) that may be not notable isn't exactly a good idea. We might as well create articles about every street in the Philippines, including alleyways and narrow lanes that people may have never heard of. Just because a template about the Philippines may include links to the provinces and just because the province of Bulacan has a template that contains links to its cities and towns does not necessarily follow that each town can do the same for their barangays. Tito Pao 01:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The Barangay article suggests that these are non-notable. It's not a good idea to have a template full of red links anyway; recreate if articles are written. A relevant discussion is at Articles for deletion/Pulong Buhangin, Sta. Maria. –Pomte 05:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Pomte. Acalamari 17:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Pomte  RogueNinja talk  23:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox VACY route

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. — freak([ talk]) 04:37, Apr. 23, 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned, deprecated; superseded by Infobox road. —  T M F Let's Go Mets - Stats 05:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete deprecated.  V 6 0  干什么？ · VDemolitions  ·  ER 3 15:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator. Acalamari 18:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - PatricknoddyTALK (reply here) | <sup style="font-variant:small-caps; color:#000000;">HISTORY 18:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom  RogueNinja <sub style="color:forestgreen;">talk  23:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- <span style="font-variant: small-caps; color:#006600!important"> master_son <sup style="font-variant: small-caps; color: #aca607!important;"> Talk <sup style="font-variant: small-caps; color: #aca607!important;"> - <sup style="font-variant: small-caps; color: #aca607!important;"> Edits 10:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.