Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 August 11



Template:KMEGAnchors

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

A massive redlink farm--plus a possible WP:NOT violation.. Blueboy96 19:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC) n64ra 18:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Full of redlinks.   ~   Wi ki  her mit  19:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, will hardly be used anywhere because the articles it should be placed on don't exist. – sebi  22:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I disagree. If you don't like the red links, remove the brackets. It is a useful template as it lists the anchors of KMEG.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:IRL C

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Template is just a word after I removed the fair use image. It also isn't used in any articles. . ~   Wi ki  her mit  19:06, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fair use image had to be removed as the template is unused, and without the image it is worthless.  Mel sa  ran  20:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, purposeless template. – sebi 22:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NarniaBooks

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:03, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

The template's depreciated (as of April) and no pages use it. — CR7 (message me) 18:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Deprecated and now orphaned. -- Satori Son 18:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant.  Mel sa  ran  18:45, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. – sebi 22:16, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. And also delete Template:NarniaCharacters, Template:NarniaPlaces. They are all depreciated at per WikiProject_Narnia/Templates. LloydSommerer 01:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. A brief look at the included pages reveals that this template has been replaced by Narnia. Grace notes T § 01:32, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-used template per above. Carlosguitar 03:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Deprecated

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delist. TFD is not a forum for revoking policy, or for discussing proposed policy.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  09:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

What is this, a prod for templates? Which deletion policy allows this? — -Nard 15:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This template is vital to WP:DOT. See my comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Deprecated and orphaned templates for more information. --MZMcBride 16:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per the comments cited above. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 16:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)'
 * Keep, vital for DOT. – sebi 22:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, even if WP:DOT is removed, still useful for marking outmoded page. — xaosflux  Talk  23:30, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Drummer

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:00, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Orphaned and redundant with Infobox musical artist. --PEJL 13:23, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. &mdash;MJCdetroit 15:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 16:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Zue Jay (talk)  16:55, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect, no need to delete it. – sebi 22:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It has no incoming links, so I don't see a need to redirect. — Black Falcon (Talk) 18:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --Kudret abi 03:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Lists of people

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete per housekeeping (G6). Looks like I'm gonna need some help here.  Singu larity  16:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

These templates serve no purpose. 175 of them are orphaned, the rest only have transclusions because they're used in other templates in the group. I've found no evidence that any of them are used in the article namespace, though I could be wrong. --MZMcBride 04:23, 11 August 2007 (UTC) Note: This list was appended and 56 templates were added. --MZMcBride 21:41, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - housekeeping. Should have been deleted along with List of people by name as per Miscellany for deletion/List of people by name. MER-C 04:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, per above and nom. – sebi 05:34, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete all of them Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 07:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as noted above, this is housekeeping. — Gavia immer (talk) 13:24, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as housekeeping. --Haemo 23:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If nobody (other admins) minds, I'd like to close this TfD (i.e., whenever consensus is reached, not right now). --MZMcBride 01:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Let me know if you need help with the deleting. --ST47 Talk·Desk 20:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cult mind control links

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Merge into Cults. Mike Peel 09:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Redundant. Delete and merge any non duplicated content to Cults ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge per proposal - the number of articles it is found in (and also the topic of said articles) doesn't warrant its continued existence...  S facets  03:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge, and redirect cult mind control links to cults. – sebi 04:37, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.