Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 August 14



Template:Aspergian Wikipedians

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no such template.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  09:53, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

How is this and the category associated with it useful to the encyclopedia? It's just a list of dozens of usernames. Having Asperger's Syndrome does not make any significant contribution to Wikipedia. Mattl 23:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Actor birth date

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Singu larity  22:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete both as unused and redundant to birth date. — Black Falcon (Talk) 20:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both - per nom. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 22:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both per nom. Carlosguitar 09:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Same as above - per creator. I had thought of using date math to "categorize" actors as children, teens or adults; and then to re-categorize a child actor when he became a teen, etc. This idea did not catch on. (By the way, the age template I created a couple of years ago is used in thousands of bio articles. It advances the "age" of a person once a year, on their birthday.) --Uncle Ed 11:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete redunant (and unused) template.-- Pre ston  H  18:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Film actor templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Singu larity  22:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC) These are actor filmography templates. Such templates should not be used in film articles, as they create clutter and are only tangentially relevant to the films themselves. They should also not be used as navboxes in the actor/actress articles because they only provide the film title and year, whereas Manual of Style (lists of works) suggests title, year, role, and notes. Approximately 25 similar templates were deleted on August 5 (link) and August 6 (link).
 * Delete all as nom. — Black Falcon (Talk) 20:26, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all - per nom. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 22:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all per ample precedent. PC78 22:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all per precedent (see my comments in the previous TFDs)  Mel sa  ran  13:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all - per nom. &mdash;MJCdetroit 13:35, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all, no doubts. Carlosguitar 09:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Coor dm NA

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 00:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete. unused and redundant to coord. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 19:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC) Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 19:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC) }}
 * Delete per nom. &mdash;MJCdetroit 04:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Unused? Have you even checked whatlinkshere for the template? I'd say there are about 1000 uses of this template. I'd recommend checking your facts before claiming that they are facts. Keep, for now. – sebi 07:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That's bizarre; I checked yesterday, and got a zero return. request withdrawn, for now. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 07:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Now showing one, shortly to be zero, uses. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 09:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That's really strange as well, because I checked before and there were so many uses, and now I recheck again and there are no uses in the mainspace. – sebi 10:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you would like to alter your "keep", accordingly? Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 10:50, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Coor gbx

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 00:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Non-standard, and redundant to coord and GeoTemplate. Was little-used; all occurrences have now been converted. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 18:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash;MJCdetroit 04:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, but its current use on Scothern fixed up before any deletion is made. – sebi 07:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. Someone had reverted my edit, at the same time restoring the claim that the local church cures AIDS..! Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 07:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:USTOC

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 00:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

This template is very close to Template:TOCStates except it cannot have other links and all of the state names are abbreviated. I switched two articles that used this one to TOCStates then realized that those were the only two articles that used this template. Basically it is not used any more and can be replaced with TOCStates. P.Haney 17:07, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundancy. – sebi 07:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox City Myanmar

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Singu larity  22:07, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete. The few articles using it were standardized to Infobox Settlement. — MJCdetroit 16:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 18:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, obsolete. – sebi 07:15, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, replaceable by Infobox Settlement. Carlosguitar 07:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Album/color/unit test

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 00:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Basically orphaned as single use (on Template:Infobox Album/color/doc) was substed to work around formatting issue. Also for consistency with sister page Template:Infobox Album/link/doc for which no such sub-template existed. --PEJL 07:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, single use is not a valid reason for its deletion. – sebi 07:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I think you are misunderstanding (which is understandable, as my nomination wasn't very clear). What was previously the single transclusion has now been substed. It is also linked from one article not related to this nomination (which is why I said "basically orphaned"). --PEJL 11:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:StarWarsCompanies

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Articles previously listed in navbox have been deleted, or links to other articles removed because the subjects are not companies. Corresponding category is similarly empty (and soon will be CfDed). --EEMeltonIV 06:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nominator's note. Is anyone else able to even see the template? It's hidden, and doesn't reappear even after clicking [show] a couple of hundred times. – sebi 07:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.