Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 December 11



Template:TES-lore

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete.  Singu larity  09:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

No longer useful due to recent deletions. —  Pagra shtak  22:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unused; no useful links; use Elder Scrolls games instead. –Pomte 04:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no longer useful navigational template. Terraxos (talk) 05:32, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete just one link left... SkierRMH  ( talk ) 07:21, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:National Hockey League awards

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete.  Singu larity  09:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

It is redundant to (and not as nicely designed as) Template:NHLawards, and it is not used on any page. — − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 15:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete redundant. --Djsasso (talk) 16:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete deprecated. –Pomte 20:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. JPG-GR (talk) 05:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Flibirigit (talk) 04:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete deprecated & redundant. SkierRMH  ( talk ) 07:21, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Appetite for Destruction

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo!

A separate navigational box for an album? I don't think this is a necessary template, considering a lot of the songs on the album that aren't singles aren't notable enough to have an article, and thus making the template pretty much useless. I don't see a point for this template, other than cluttering the bottom of pages.  Spebi  08:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * If consensus is to keep, suggest moving links into a hidden section in the main GNR template, that can be enabled on the song articles by some parameter. That way, the organization is more intuitive. –Pomte 20:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * A lot of the articles on the template are simply songs and aren't notable enough to merit a valid article. The singles on the template are already linked from the main template anyway.  Spebi  08:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Get the non-notable song articles deleted then. –Pomte 04:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with Spebi. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm sceptical of the idea of creating navigation templates for albums, but this one at least seems justified; all the songs it links do (currently) have their own articles, and given that it makes sense to link them to the rest of the album. If some of these song articles get deleted, as perhaps they should, then this template should be reconsidered; but for now, it's useful. Terraxos (talk) 05:32, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I do not think this is common practice, and it seems more of a standardization issue. Besides the track listing is already listed in the article. Might suggest posting a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Guns N' Roses for their members to opine in the TfD.-- 12 N oo n 2¢ 22:31, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Spebi, and because we generally only use these for bands. The band navbox can contain links to singles if you wish. &mdash; Dihydrogen Monoxide  01:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:IHL Team

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete.  Singu larity  09:25, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Deprecated template. Superceded by Template:Pro hockey team. Flibirigit (talk) 02:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Deprecated template, not transcluded in any articles. Flibirigit (talk) 02:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Djsasso (talk) 02:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Pparazorback (talk) 05:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JPG-GR (talk) 05:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Kaiser matias (talk) 17:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete deprecated & superseded. SkierRMH  ( talk ) 07:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.