Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 February 14



Template:Sliders episode

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Was duplicating Infobox Television episode all uses have been replaced with that template, which also resulted in the obsoleting of Sliders navigation. This is part of a larger effort to remove duplicity in episode infoboxes. -- TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 21:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete obselete and redunadant. Jay32183 21:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unused. - grubber 16:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Sliders navigation

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Duplicated default successionbox, and together with the Sliders episode template is now merged into the more general Infobox Television episode. No longer in use. -- TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 21:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete obselete and redundant. Jay32183 21:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unused. - grubber 16:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Stamford, Connecticut infobox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Single use template version of Infobox City that placed outside of the article. Substituted infobox with the standard Infobox City inside article. Placed infobox city data within the article as it was intended. --MJCdetroit 17:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't know why people insist on creating templates when there are some that already exist that are more general/detailed/better serve the purpose.  Shiori 13:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:3diUS

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Unused, deprecated template. Redundant to Infobox U.S. Route. -- T M F Let's Go Mets - Stats 17:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete deprecated.  V 6 0  VTalk · VDemolitions 01:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete above. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

London Underground templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete all. –Llama mantalkcontribs 03:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

These templates have all been superseded by the s-rail and s-line templates for railroad succession. All article space transclusions removed. The relevant project pages have been updated. Mackensen (talk) 16:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Also the following redirects (since checking 88 "what links here" would be a pain in the ass):
 * Template:STL four and two lines to one
 * Template:STL nine lines
 * Template:STL one and two and six lines to one
 * Template:STL one and six and two lines to one --- RockMFR 17:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete These templates are just taking up unnecessary server space, there is no reason to keep them in my opinion. Telly   addict Editor review! 17:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - made redundant by #switch:, although you are aware that deleting articles doesn't free up server space... ed g2s • talk 17:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as superceeded. Agathoclea 20:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as obsolete. - grubber 16:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Less obsolete templates means less chance of confusion. Adambro 19:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:PD-Romania-Photo

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Umless I'm completely mistaken this is not in any way a public domain license. The "justification" is this section from the Romanian law:"A photograph of a person, when made to order, may be published or reproduced by the person photographed or his successors without the author's consent, unless otherwise agreed, provided that if the name of the author appears on the original photograph, it must also be shown on the reproduction."My reading of this is simply that the person who paid ("made to order") to have a photo of himself take have the right to publish this photo even wihtout the consent of the photographer. How this section of the law has been twisted into meaning that the photo is in the public domain is beyond my understanding. We should delete this misleading template. --Sherool (talk) 12:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete before it can do damage, per nom; furthermore highly complex, may lead to incorrect or at least obscure license use Arnoutf 14:08, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per above. I'm going to go now and remove it from any images. -Amarkov moo! 15:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:FuturamaSeasonHeader

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Was created 3 months ago, is unused, is "broken" (the links it directs you to do not exist), and is unlikely to be used any time soon. — CobraWiki ( jabber 08:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.  Cat tleG irl  '' talk 08:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Arnoutf 14:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete Because it was created three months ago and one of the links is non existent, I agree that the chances of it being created are slim. Telly   addict Editor review! 17:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 21:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.