Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 May 17



Template:NewEpisodeList

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete ~  Anthøny  17:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

This template is redundant, as the template Episode list already exists. It was used on one page, possibly in order to get around the policy shift to disallow images in episode list pages. — Ipstenu ( talk | contribs ) 23:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete never used; redundant. Jmlk17 00:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. BD2412  T 02:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Boondocks episode

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete ~  Anthøny  17:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Series specific fork of Infobox Television episode, all uses have been replaced. Time to delete. Jay32183 21:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes, it is time to delete. I agree per nomination. Jmlk17 00:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Iamunknown 19:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OK.DL

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete ~  Anthøny  17:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

One more source tag disguised as copyright tag. . — Abu badali (talk) 20:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Ugh...not a fan of these. Just another source tag; delete it. Jmlk17 00:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - contrary to our policy on non-free content. Grace notes T § 03:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm, where at http://www.odl.state.ok.us/ does it say we can use the images as long as credit is given? --Iamunknown 21:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Recent deaths

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete ~  Anthøny  17:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Does not appear to be used anywhere. Must be manually updated, and has not been updated in over a year. — Bigr  Tex  19:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, unmaintained and unmaintainable. Picaroon (Talk) 23:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Flawed, unused, unreliable. Delete. Jmlk17 00:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Flawed, faulted, failing, floundering, unused, unreliable, unmaintained, unmaintainable, disfigured, deformed, deceptive, [dramatic discontinuance] delete Grace notes T § 20:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no use, bad idea. Punkmorten 14:57, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Function templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete All ~  Anthøny  17:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

These templates were superseded by parser functions and have been deprecated for ages – nearly a year. Can we finally substitute the remaining uses and get rid of them? It would also be nice to do the same with, but that's still protected and it seems people want to keep it indefinitely for some reason – Gurch 00:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, I was actually thinking of nominating them myself eventually. ^ demon [omg plz] 08:10, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to Archive subpages, replace all uses with ParserFunctions The coding is an interesting historical feature. The use of the templates should be discouraged, though. Don't subst, because it won't work. --ais523 12:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I am working on a page detailing the (evil) mechanics of template conditionals. Grace notes T § 20:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unnecessary and unusable. Jmlk17 00:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Move and replace as per User:ais523 DES (talk) 14:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.