Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 November 24



Template:Polish Football Cup winners

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 04:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Unnecessary navigation tool, per Templates for deletion/Log/2007 November 14 and Templates for deletion/Log/2007 November 14. — A  ecis Brievenbus 13:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep This template is very useful for all football fans, otherwise they will have to spend a lot of time looking for winners of the Cup of Poland Tymek (talk) 20:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * How much time does it take to look at Polish Cup? A  ecis Brievenbus 22:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with nom, these are uneccessary. They bloat the article and will only continue to expand. Woodym555 (talk) 14:38, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per previous. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  09:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mountainindex

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep.  Spebi  21:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Entirely unnecessary split of disambig that follows neither the accepted format for disambiguation templates nor the usual naming scheme. Circeus (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong keep. This is not for disambiguation. This is to mark Set index articles as applicable to mountains. See Shipindex as a parallel structure (that came first, this is a copy). This template (which also autocategorizes into a category) was established by consensus in May, see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)/Archive 29. Please do not delete: it is useful for maintanence. If you find the text is not user friendly, please feel free to edit. hike395 (talk) 04:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, while List of peaks named Stone Mountain and similar pages can be construed as "indices", pages like Mount Babel and Baker Mountain (and practically all pages not explicitly "list of") are still actually disambiguation pages.Circeus (talk) 18:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or move. If the problem is that it doesn't follow the accepted format for disambiguation templates, then the solution is to reword / reformat it.  If the problem is that it doesn't follow the usual naming scheme, the solution is to move it.  I haven't seen any explanation as to why it should be deleted.  — ras52 (talk) 12:19, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Improve the template per ras52 above. Style issues (if they exist) are not a reson for deleting a template if it can be fixed instead. — Gavia immer (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep as per hike395. RedWolf (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a useful template for set indices, which are not the same as standard disambiguation pages. Maralia (talk) 17:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The different format, e.g. the inclusion of external links, is the reason this was split off from the generic disambiguation. —wwoods (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep & improve if needed. SkierRMH (talk) 02:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 06:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as the others -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 08:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.