Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 April 18



Template:PermissionOTRS-ID

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Deprecated template that has been removed from all usages.. Kelly hi! 23:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete depreciated, not used. Atyndall93  |  talk  03:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Comment hopefully TfD isn't the wrong venue this time (see history of template and past TfDs).  -- Thin  boy  00  @537, i.e. 11:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:James Wm. Chichetto

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Reads like an article in template-space. Evidently created by mistake, by the same user who created James Wm. Chichetto with much of the same content. Russ (talk) 19:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not suitable for Template: space. Atyndall93  |  talk  03:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. If further consensus emerges, Snowball Delete.  Furthermore, ask the author to blank it/add db-author if it was a mistake.  -- Thin  boy  00  @538, i.e. 11:55, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment it might be a copyvio; scroll down a bit when viewing it. Look at those quotes.  -- Thin  boy  00  @541, i.e. 11:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Military of Pakistan

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Will change to Pakistan Military Topics WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't think there is any need of this template because a better navigation template, "Pakistan Military Topics", for Military of Pakistan is there. . S M S   Talk 19:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, the other template is more useful for navigation. Grace notes T § 20:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete just a slimmed down version of Template:Pakistan Military Topics. Atyndall93  |  talk  03:29, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete the other template is far superior than this one.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 10:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all, and if it gets no keep !votes, Snowball it. -- Thin  boy  00  @546, i.e. 12:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Company Digital 21

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete per CSD G7 - only author blanked the page. --Oxymoron83 12:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

No transclusions and pointless to boot. It seems to be article content in Template: space or a malformatted attempt at coding an Infobox. Either way it is not necessary.. Richard Ω6  12  14:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. There are probably no transclusions because it was created 3 days ago :) This template does appear to be an advertisement for a company, and the author has blanked it. As text content, it can just as well go in the article namespace. Grace notes T § 17:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete has been blanked by creator and is not suitable for Template: namespace. Atyndall93  |  talk  03:30, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete for the blanking, so tagged. -- Thin  boy  00  @543, i.e. 12:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Events in video gaming by month links

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

There is no use to this template. Only 2 article are using this template. This template was used in articles like 2008 in video gaming and many others and was replace by this template :- Years in Video Gaming. — SkyWalker (talk) 13:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete has been depreciated by Template:Years in Video Gaming. Atyndall93  |  talk  03:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:Atyndall-- Lenticel ( talk ) 10:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.