Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 April 3



Template:Barkjon/headerbar

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was already speedily deleted as CSD G6. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This template is not being used on any articles, and should not be on the Template namespace.. Macy (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, I'll change it.-- B a r k j o n 23:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:666 Satan FUR

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

A rather poor reimplementation of Non-free fair use rationale, the fact of the matter is that it isn't needed and add insufficient or incorrect information about the source of the image, the portion if the image used, and whether it is in low resolution. Only three images ever used the template and those where easily subseted to allow for their FUR to be fixed. The template has already been at TfD once, but one substantial reason was given to maintain the template. --Farix (Talk) 22:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, unnecessary duplicate of existing template. Collectonian (talk) 06:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useless duplicate. --erachima talk 06:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Military Submarine

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This infobox template has been deprecated by the much more versatile Infobox Ship Begin/doc. It is has been replaced on all pages. Thanks. — Woody (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom.  H aus  Talk   13:46, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The replacement template is more flexible and widely accepted through consensus. This is just a housekeeping nom. — Bellhalla (talk)
 * Delete per nom. --Brad (talk) 01:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Midorihana ~いいですね?  はい! 07:35, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DEPTH

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Unused template. Not likely to be used again, and author have been inactive for some months.. Leo Laursen – ☏ ⌘ 10:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This template seems to be a way of calculating List of Wikipedias's depth factor, which was (Edits/Articles × Non-Articles/Articles) when the template was created, but has since changed to include a stub factor. This template could be considered deprecated. For posterity (if Wikipedia lasts that long), the template's text is, and this text (revision 150593938) is attributable to User:Quoth nevermore. However, the template itself has been deprecated, and likely should be deleted.  Grace notes T § 03:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no longer useful, as Meta now uses a different method of calculating this function. Terraxos (talk) 03:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Africa religion

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Redundant of Africa topic. — -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep; how is a template that links to articles of the form Religion_in_African_nation redundant with one that links to African nations?--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Typing  will produce a template that is virtually identical to this one, with one exception: the links to Christianity in Africa, Hinduism in Africa, etc. do not appear with Africa topic. Black Falcon (Talk) 21:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep The links to the religions (Christianity, Hinduism, etc) are important links that are not possible with Africa topic. Mangostar (talk) 22:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dark-Hunters Series

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This navigational template for the Dark-Hunter series links to only three articles which are actually about the series: the main article, Dark-Hunters, and Dream-Hunters. The articles are more than adequately connected via text links and most of the links are to articles which have only tangential relevance to the series. Black Falcon (Talk) 01:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -Sean Curtin (talk) 07:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete the nominator makes a good point. This may be too narrow of a field for a template.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 02:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.