Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 December 8



Template:Cinema of Europe

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 01:15, 17 December 2008 (UTC)



No transclusions and (red links aside) redundant to the more global Worldcinema. PC78 (talk) 23:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Better than other one. -- Encyclopedia77 Talk 14:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That's a rather subjective opinion, and hardly a reason for "speedy keep". PC78 (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Per my reasons: 1. This template is semi-redundant to Template:European cinema and it appears that this one was meant to replace it but it has never came to Consensus. 2. Also as you can see form the formating of Cinema of Germany you can see that Template:Cinema of Europe is not being used, instead Template:European cinema is being used on the side of the page near the top as a hidden box template with the specifics of the continent and the Template:Worldcinema is being used on the bottom. If you used Template:Cinema of Europe indeed it would be redundant to Template:Worldcinema as both templates are in the same format per noms rationale.  Sawblade05  (talk to me undefined my wiki life) 05:38, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - redundant to both Worldcinema (more comprehensive) and European cinema (looks better, works as a sidebar). There's no reason to have this template when those two work well already. Terraxos (talk) 17:11, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:repeat vandal

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a valid deletion rationale. JPG-GR (talk) 06:09, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

I do not believe it creates much of a use by its wording, and some people do not like it I believe all templates like it should be deleted, seeing that the person warning is not blind (Includes my template, VNS. Encyclopedia77 Talk 22:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep - High use template, used on over 4,000 user pages, that serves a valid purpose. --AussieLegend (talk) 01:09, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as the nom rationale WP:IDONTLIKEIT I feel is invalid and per the TFD Archive at Templates for deletion/Log/2008 December 3, Your template was deleted per redundancy of this one you nominated. I also agree with AussieLegend's rational. I am hoping you didn't nominate this for deletion as revenge of the deletion of Template:VNS. Unless you can come up for a better deletion rationale I am voting Speedy Keep.  Sawblade05  (talk to me undefined my wiki life) 05:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, evident "revenge" tactic and an "I don't like it" nomination.  Garden . 20:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.