Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 July 15



Template:PPT

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

LIttle used template which seems intended to be used at the top of category pages (see Category:Frelinghuysen family), which adds the text "People, places, and things associated with [category name]", which is unnecessary and redundant, given that's precisely what a category denotes. — Zim Zala Bim  talk  20:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep its adds text to categories so they aren't redlinked, even if the don't have a supercategory. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete -, which is more widely used, achieves this same purpose. iced kola(Mmm...) 00:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per iced kola. -- Jeandré, 2008-07-16t12:28z
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bulgarian art history

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Template is broken and unused since 2006. PeterSymonds (talk)  13:20, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Broken, not used anywhere. — GregorB (talk) 19:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete clean up broken unused stuff —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carbonrodney (talk • contribs) 07:27, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 11:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Jeandré, 2008-07-16t12:30z
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Brixton

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete per consenus; broken and unused. PeterSymonds (talk)  09:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Broken, not used anywhere. — GregorB (talk) 19:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete clean up broken unused stuff --Carbonrodney (talk) 07:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, also per nom. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 11:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Arbox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete as an unused an unneeded template (per consensus). PeterSymonds (talk)  08:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

No one is using it and it is redundant with either Archives and Archive box. — KelleyCook (talk) 14:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. iced kola(Mmm...) 00:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 11:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Waste of space. --Carbonrodney (talk) 05:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Brazilian number-one hits

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete; articles on which this template was used are now deleted through AfD. PeterSymonds (talk)  08:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

It's a red link festival Do U(knome)?  yes...|or no 00:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - All articles in that template have been deleted per Articles for deletion/Hot100Brasil for being spam. iced kola(Mmm...) 00:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete clean up useless stuff --Carbonrodney (talk) 07:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Iced Kola. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 11:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.