Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 July 16



Template:Anheuser-Busch InBev

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

This template is not necessary as this company doesn't even exist. Never before have there been such templates created for corporate buyouts, e.g. there was never a "Proposed merged of SBC Communications and AT&T Corporation" template. KansasCity (talk) 00:39, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. --Carbonrodney (talk) 05:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Only really applies to 1, at most 3 articles, and unnecessarily huge. It appears to just be Template:Anheuser-Busch with some InBev information thrown in. Mr.Z-man 00:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chaos Space Marine Legions

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete as an orphaned template. WP:CSD also applies. PeterSymonds (talk)  13:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

No longer needed. All entries have been deleted (see Articles for deletion/World Eaters) or are redirects to Chaos Space Marines.  Sandstein  18:52, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as author. Now that there's finally some traction on deleting the articles it maps, it's unnecessary. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 19:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: If author wants it gone, and it's not being used then get rid of it. --Carbonrodney (talk) 05:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as unnecessary for the reasons stated above (i.e. all articles in the template have been deleted or redirected elsewhere). --Craw-daddy | T | 14:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Now, wouldn't this fall under WP:CSD? Still, this should be deleted for concerns expressed above. &mdash; Mizu onna sango15 / Discuss 03:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ReliableSource

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete as an orphaned template, replaced with Template:Verify credibility. PeterSymonds (talk)  13:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Replaced the page it was used on with Template:Verify credibility -- Jeandré, 2008-07-16t09:22z 09:22, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, unused, unnecessary. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 11:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: agree with Anna. --Carbonrodney (talk) 05:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Orphaned and not needed. &mdash; Mizu onna sango15 / Discuss 03:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Färjestads BK squad

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. Templates do not have to a fit a certain project to stick around. Fix it if it's an issue :) WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:49, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:HOCKEY consensus is not to have these kinds of templates in hockey related articles. Template is not updated. — Krm500 (talk) 00:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * weak keep It would be nice to have something like this for all the teams --Carbonrodney (talk) 07:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment We have these templates in WP:Hockey however, they are just used on season pages and over all league roster pages. They do have a slightly different format as can be seen at Template:Calgary Flames roster. -Djsasso (talk) 00:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:49, 24 July 2008 (UTC)