Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 July 17



Template:Fakecn

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete  Maxim (talk)  02:19, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Largely unused "fake" version of fact only for use in userpages as a joke. I see very few links to this template in joke form, and see no purpose for this template. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Chirps•Clams•Chowder) 19:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wow. Whoever uses a as a "joke" has some ridiculous sense of humor. Absolutely no reason for existence. Paragon12321 (talk) 21:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete &mdash; seldom used and doesn't have much purpose. If absolutely needed, one could use fact and remove the categories. &mdash; Mizu onna sango15 / Discuss 03:34, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete  Maxim (talk)  02:19, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Unused and unmaintained template for a UK military (?) troop. --Thetrick (talk) 13:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I've appended two very similar unused templates.
 * Comment -- All these refer to British army regiments. There are articles on each regiment in which they might be used, but they in fact seem to be duplicating (but less well) the "military infobox" in the article for each regiment.  I therefore suspect they are redundant, in which case they should be deleted.  I windeer whether there are not many more of these for British regiments.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The 2007 Open Championship at Carnoustie Golf Links

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete  Maxim (talk)  02:19, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Unused 1-off template that just shows yards and pars. --Thetrick (talk) 13:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Terrorcampaignbox Iraq

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete  Maxim (talk)  02:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Unused template that is incomplete and has some POV problems. --Thetrick (talk) 12:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - unused POV pushing infobox --T-rex 15:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per T-rex. POV-pushing template and is not used anywhere to begin with. &mdash; Mizu onna sango15 / Discuss 03:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Not sure where the POV comes in... looks more like it's just insanely incomplete. Or maybe I'm just missing it? ''' bahamut0013 ♠  ♣  22:39, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Territories of France map

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete  Maxim (talk)  02:19, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Unused map template. --Thetrick (talk) 12:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kristy Lee Cook

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete per WP:SNOW. Only instance removed. PeterSymonds (talk)  10:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Way way too early for this. Kristy has one independent album and that's really it. None of the AI contestants have templates unless they are notable in some way outside of Idol and she isn't as of yet. — WoohookittyWoohoo! 04:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: I agree, it provides no further navigability and basically just says in a Template what could be said in a sentence. --Carbonrodney (talk) 05:52, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ejfetters (talk) 06:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Doesn't really provide any new links. CrazyC83 (talk) 19:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Unnecessary template for now. Wait until she's had an album and a couple chart singles at least. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Chirps•Clams•Chowder) 21:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unnecessary. KLC doesn't appear to be notable outside of American Idol at this point, so a template is not needed. &mdash; Mizu onna sango15 / Discuss 03:38, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Nooooo.... it's melting!!!--Pmedema (talk) 14:30, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ford vehicles

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep   Maxim (talk)  17:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Redundant - purpose is already served by other templates in place, and this is very incomplete also. — Ejfetters (talk) 06:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Because Ford has had non-vehicle subsidiaries, all the vehicles in Template:Ford should be moved here, and Template:FordEurope deleted instead. --Thetrick (talk) 15:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment To expand, Template:Ford combines articles about the Ford Motor Company and articles about Ford-branded vehicles. Note that Template:Ford has no Lincoln or Mercury vehicles, nor even links to those brands.  But Edsel is included in the model list, although labeled as a brand.  --Thetrick (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * the Ford timeline templates already do the job of listing all the Ford models - this template is redundant - it's just a list of the vehicles that are already in the template before. 74.204.40.46 (talk) 02:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable and useful, as shown by, among other things, no red-links in template. --Friejose (talk) 23:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * But all the information on this template is already in templates. The information is all duplicated here, redundant. 74.204.40.46 (talk) 06:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.