Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 July 18



Template:2008-09 Boston Celtics playoff game log

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete   Maxim (talk)  02:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Violation of WP:CBALL; the Celtics have not made the 2009 NBA Playoffs as the 2008–09 regular season has not even started. — LOL T/C 22:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The Boston Celtics or any team haven't made the 2009 NBA playoffs, so the template isn't necessary right now. Erik93 (talk) 00:52, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Also, notify the user of WP:CBALL. iced kola(Mmm...) 03:07, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.— Chris!  c t 05:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Average and record temperatures

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete   Maxim (talk)  02:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Redundant. There is nothing that this new template does that Infobox Weather can not already do and do easier with less of a chance of committing an error. The few pages that do use this can be standardized to use the standard infobox &mdash;  MJC detroit  (yak) 17:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Sten Chronicles bibliography

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete   Maxim (talk)  02:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

1-off template. Unused. --Thetrick (talk) 14:43, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EskimosQuarterback

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus  Maxim (talk)  02:21, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Purports to list all "starting quarterbacks" for the Eskimos, without defining what is very much a subjective term. — Sarcasticidealist (talk) 04:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Locobot (talk) 01:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC) --WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:43, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment There are a number of similar templates here. This whole class should be discussed. --Thetrick (talk) 14:15, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Agree with Comment. I agree with Thetrick, the entire category of CFL starting QB's should be discussed.  Most of the templates appear to have be created by Hirolovesswords in a relatively short time frame, and have few other editors contributing.  I do, however, think there may be some validity for having such a template, as it is typically easy to factually determine the starting quarterbacks involved, though I might be concerned about insuring accuracy and/or overlarge templates due to the number of players listed. --Friejose (talk) 23:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.