Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 July 3



Category:Dist templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This is a group nomination of all of the "Dist" templates.

These templates are redundant to convert. However, their functionality falls significantly below that of.

Of particular concern is the automatic linking. All of these templates link both the input and output units to their respective articles, however, WP:OVERLINK states "In general, do not create links to ... common units of measurement". This is especailly problematic if the template is use more than once in an article. The templates could be edited to turn the linking off but a better solution would be to make it optional ... better still, make it such that the input & output units could be linked independantly— does this.

Another concern is the automatic abbreviation. All of these templates abbreviate both the input and output units, however, MOS:CONVERSIONS states "In the main text, spell out the main units and use unit symbols or abbreviations for conversions in parentheses". Again, the templates could be edited to spell out the input unit but there are times when it should be abbreviated (e.g. in infoboxes). Furthermore, it's not a simple matter of spell-out verses abbreviate, allowance must be made for adjective forms. does all of this.

These templates were created as a set of alternatives length conversion. Like at the time,  was having template limit problems. was overhauled. is up for deletion.

The solution to 's problems was the creation of the "Dist" templates. This solution never did gain a lot of popularity. Those few transclusions the "Dist" template did have were suffering from the problems mentioned above. Another problem I found with many of the transclusions was the use of the "Dist" templates' default rounding—rounding to the nearest whole number, which was often too much or too little precision. , on the other hand, uses a default rounding which is dependant on the precision of the input value. I've therefore switched them over to. The only remaining transclusions are on the templates themselves & on their category page.

This nomination naturally includes the category itself (again) since empty categorys are speedily deleted.

J IM ptalk·cont 05:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Redundant, no transclusions (unknown if anyone is subst-ing these templates). Thetrick (talk) 23:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Food and Drink/Foodservice taskforce

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted by somebody. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Tagged for speedy deletion by Jerem43 (talk • contribs • count ) with the following reason: "because this template has been incorporated to the main project template, is no longer needed." I removed the speedy tag because it was transcluding to many talk pages and therefore adding those talk pages to Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion. Eastmain (talk) 02:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

The transclusions should have been eliminated as part of a retagging project today. The Foodservice task force (Which I pretty much am running) had a bot putting the newly modified WPFOOD template in place and it was supposed to be deleting the older WikiProject Food and Drink/Foodservice taskforce tag. I will put in a bot request to have them deleted as they were supposed to be during the run today.
 * Comment:

--Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 02:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - As Jeremy and I are the only two active members and I agree with what he has done to incorporate it into our projects main banner, it needs to go.--Chef Tanner (talk) 03:02, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. There are still many transclusions listed at Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:WikiProject_Food_and_Drink/Foodservice_taskforce. Once the bot run is finished, please manually remove the template from any pages where it remains. -- Eastmain (talk) 03:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Notice - all transcluded links dealing with articles have been deleted. --Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 04:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Undercon

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedily redirected to underconstruction as an intuitive shortcut. Sceptre (talk) 17:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Why is this needed, its not in use by any body, but one user. This a redundant substitute to the underconstruction template.  S R X  -- Latino Heat  16:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Asiir picture

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Should be replaced with. BJ Talk 05:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed, tell me when this passes and I'll get MBisanzBot on it, don't delete though until a bot has worked it.  MBisanz  talk 05:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Thetrick (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.