Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 June 15



Template:Iso birth date and age

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 16:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

This template is unused and undocumented. I fixed some problems with it a long time ago but without a purpose for it I suggest it be deleted rather than worked on any further. — PatLeahy (talk) 19:00, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless it has some useful purpose which is made clear. Terraxos (talk) 01:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete can't see any use for it.ÜÖÏËÄ ÄËÏÖÜ (talk) 18:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-TRGov-Military-Air Force

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 16:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

No basis for PD claim. ViperSnake151 13:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. ÜÖÏËÄ ÄËÏÖÜ (talk) 18:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chem disclaimer

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 16:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Does WP:NDA apply outside articlespace? ViperSnake151 13:28, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Not in this instance. While obviously in good faith, it is redundant to the risk disclaimer and possibly medical disclaimer. It also lends a less than professional tone to the article and offers doubts to what can be found within Wikipedia; after all, we are supposed to be a reliable encyclopedia. ''' bahamut0013 ♠  ♣  16:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. It was made in good faith a long (wiki)time ago, but I think it is now superfluous. I am posting a notice at WT:Chem to get more opinion. Physchim62 (talk) 15:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete --Rifleman 82 (talk) 16:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't mind this being deleted, but I think two things need addressing. (1) It will need to be replaced by something indicating the temperature and pressure of standard data.  (2) The general disclaimer needs beefing up a little.  If our article says "mostly harmless" and someone then kills him/herself with the stuff, the general disclaimer may cover this somewhat.  However, I'd like to see that spelled out explicitly in a phrase like "such as safety information".  This coincides with our policy at WP:Chem that our articles are not MSDS sheets. Walkerma (talk) 17:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete but agree with Walkerma's comment 1. Unqualified for comment 2. Freestyle-69 (talk) 02:40, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Cacycle (talk) 03:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Point 1 is trivial. We can replace this template with {{{tl|Standard conditions}}. Don't do it just yet though - Standard conditions talks about ... STP - 273 K/ 100 kPa. I think we mean RTP - 298 K/100kPa. I can't find an article on room temperature and pressure in WP though. With regard to the second point, perhaps we should insert this into the general disclaimer and WP:NOT instead of transcluding the disclaimer? --Rifleman 82 (talk) 02:41, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikipediholic

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. Wizardman 16:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Someone has edited it creating spam. It redirects to template:User Wikipediholic. Note the lowercase. Carter | Talk to me 12:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy close - the vandalism has been removed and the editor responsible has been blocked indefinitely. I don't see any need to delete either the template or this redirect. Terraxos (talk) 01:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.