Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 March 14



Template:Police Squad! Special Guests

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete - clutterful template that serves no useful purpose. Gives undue weight to a single guest-shot appearance from decades ago. — Otto4711 (talk) 23:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:East-West relations

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

No changes since 2006 and doesn't appear to be used anywhere. I propose that it be deleted as well. Kafka Liz (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is one of a series of other templates (see below) that are being deleted as a part of the cleanup of the userspace of . He was recently put on an ArbCom restriction about the editing of history articles, and it was also discussed at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Franco-Mongol alliance/Proposed decision that he is not allowed to use his userspace to indefinitely archive disputed content.  Now that the case has been closed, deleting this template is part of the cleanup process. If there are any other related templates, I recommend just including them all in the same deletion discussion, rather than making a separate entry for each one. --Elonka 21:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Franco-Mongol alliance

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:08, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

All the articles pertaining to this template have been deleted. Kafka Liz (talk) 16:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - templates only use was to navigate through three articles that have been deleted through AfD. Shell babelfish 16:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Shell Kinney. The template no longer serves any purpose. --Elonka 17:35, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously. Srnec (talk) 05:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Temp:Chaldean Catholic Hierarchy

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete G6 by User:SatyrTN. Non-admin close. JPG-GR (talk) 01:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

The "template" is in the wrong namespace, and is redundant because there is a more properly entitled Template:Chaldean Catholic Hierarchy. It was orphaned when I found it, and I believe was just a mistake. Gentgeen (talk) 09:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note, I'm not going to keep changing all these built in templates one at a time to make the links work. You'll have to investigate the hard way. Sometimes, I think all our template cuteness gets in the way of doing things that need to be done. Gentgeen (talk) 09:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The template links should be fixed now. Meanwhile, the template was created at the same approximate time by the same editor, so it's just housekeeping to delete the nominated page. I'll speedy tag it in a minute. — Gavia immer (talk) 13:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.