Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 March 16



Template:KelvinToCelsius and Template:KelvinToCelsius

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * (redirect from misspelling)
 * (redirect from misspelling)

This template is not in use. It is redundant to convert. — Jɪmp 23:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: You may want to include CelsiusToKelvin (which also has a misspelled redirect, IIRC). I'm not so sure I like convert enough to say yes or no to deletion, but if that's the consensus view, go for it. —Locke Cole • t • c 23:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sqmi-acres-hect

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

This template is not in use. It is redundant to convert. — Jɪmp 23:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete in favour of convert. In this case I think it's easier to have one template to cover these conversions. PeterSymonds | talk  17:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AMRL

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Template is redundant, deprecated, and no longer in use. (AML is the current preferred template of WikiProject Radio Stations for linking to Radio Locator.) — Dravecky (talk) 15:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as entirely redundant. Grace notes T § 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Template is redundant, no longer needed Steve Crossin (talk) 22:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:University College Dublin RFC Squad 2007/2008

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

There is no need for this template due to the existence of Template:University College Dublin Rugby squad. Furthermore, following the lead of WP:FOOTBALL, templates for clubs' squads in individual seasons should not exist. – PeeJay 00:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Asimov's Imperium

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

The template is filled with redlinks which will not likely be filled with sustainable/source-able articles soon. Pages it is displayed on are linked to related topics in other ways. &mdash;ScouterSig 00:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Suggestion Could the existing links be merged into Template:Isaac Asimov novels? The sectors aren't novels by him, per se&mdash;they're in-universe locations&mdash;but they would be germane to the template. Grace notes T § 19:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I am trying to do some needed cleanup. The information will most likely be merged instead with List of Foundation universe planets and List of minor Foundation-universe planets. &mdash;ScouterSig 23:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I have 'finished' merging the information on the template to other articles. The template now serves no useful purpose and is only displayed on one page. &mdash;ScouterSig 17:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Deletion should be fine at this point. Grace notes T § 17:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SFU Nation Alt

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete by User:Christopher Parham, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)



Unused and redundant to Template:SFU Nation.. fschoenm (talk) 17:27, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No objection. Was an experiment which I abandoned in my early days of trying to learn templates. --Donovan Ravenhull (talk) 12:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox:

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10 (Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Unused and redundant to Infobox Company template used in article The Halo Group. — Jusjih (talk) 22:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I am working to edit the content to remove the redundancy. When have made changes would you be willing to review to make sure it is acceptable? How would I get the other alerts removed? Denise Goodwin Pace (talk) 18:23, 18 March 2008 (UTC)A.M.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.